The Man on the Spot: Christopher Soames and Decolonisation of Zimbabwe/Rhodesia

Onslow, Sue

doi:10.3366/brw.2013.0078

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nicknamed 'Fatty Soames', he was a large and boisterous figure renowned for his talents of persuasion and diplomacy. 130 He asked to meet personally with Hurd, bringing the chairman and director with him, a request to which his officials readily agreed. 131 Hurd was also lobbied repeatedly by Robert McCrindle, an MP who was an insurance broker and a parliamentary consultant to the insurance industry.…”

Section: British Policy On Kidnap and Ransom Insurancementioning

confidence: 99%

Secrets, hostages, and ransoms: British kidnap policy in historical perspective

Aldrich

Herrington

2018

Rev. Int. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Britain has long taken a firm public line against terrorist ransom, insisting that yielding to terrorist demands only encourages further acts of intimidation and kidnapping. Hitherto, academic research has tended to take these assertions of piety at face value. This article uses a historical approach to show that the British position has shifted over time and was often more complex and pragmatic. Indeed, Britain’s position with regard to kidnap and ransom insurance has, until quite recently, been rather ambiguous. We use the British case to suggest that, rather than dividing states into groups that make concessions and those that do not, it is perhaps better to recognise there is often a broad spectrum of positions, sometimes held by different parts of the same government, together with the private security companies that move in the shadows on their behalf. One of the few things that unites them is a tendency to dissemble and this presents some intriguing methods problems for researchers.

show abstract

Section: British Policy On Kidnap and Ransom Insurancementioning

confidence: 99%

Secrets, hostages, and ransoms: British kidnap policy in historical perspective

Aldrich

Herrington

2018

Rev. Int. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

British Institutions and Actors

Cullen

2017

Kenya and Britain After Independence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pattern, Puzzle, and Peculiarity: Rhodesia’s UDI and Decolonisation in Southern Africa

Law

2017

The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On 18th April 1980, the Union Jack was finally lowered at Government House, Harare. Presiding over this muted piece of imperial theatre, Lord Soames, who had been appointed interim governor of Rhodesia at the end of 1979, was flanked by Prince Charles, with both men mustering the appropriate level of solemnity that befitted the occasion. i Ninety years after the pioneer column had raised the Union Flag, its lowering in April 1980 symbolised the formal end of British control in the country, the birth of Zimbabwe, and had so lved one of the most intractable episodes in the history of Britain's decolonisation. Some twenty years earlier, the British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, had spoken of the 'Wind of Change' blowing through the African continent. 'Whether we like it or not', he opinedopined the Edwardian poseur, 'this growth of national consciousness is a political fact'. ii Despite this, however, one place that the wind seemingly skirted was central and Southern Africa. Just as Macmillan's speech received its second airing in Cape Town in February 1960, Walter Monckton commenced his tour of the Central African Federation being ostensibly charged by the British government to assess its health. Seven years after Federation had been inaugurated, it was becoming increasingly clear that the impulses that first simulated the territorial amalgamation between Southern Rhodesia, Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland were diminishing. Created as a 'counterpoise to Afrikaner nationalism' and promoted as a way to satisfy both white and black nationalism, Federation was theoretically supposed to bring 'partnership' between black and white within the three territories. iii Yet, 'partnership' was 'purposefully vague, with its opacity lending itself to a variety of meanings'. iv As leading African nationalist, Joshua Nkomo, recalled in his memoirs, 'Huggins . . . explained what Federation was really about. He stated that his aim was to create in Central Africa a new partnership like that of the rider and the horse. That was very honest. The white man was to ride, the black man was to carry him'. v Finally published in October 1960, the Monckton Commission's report concluded that the only way to maintain Federation was through force. As Philip Murphy has demonstrated, while the British government were not prepared to commit themselves militarily to quell the rising tide of African nationalism, they were also not

show abstract

The Man on the Spot: Christopher Soames and Decolonisation of Zimbabwe/Rhodesia

Cited by 6 publications

References 1 publication

Secrets, hostages, and ransoms: British kidnap policy in historical perspective

Secrets, hostages, and ransoms: British kidnap policy in historical perspective

British Institutions and Actors

Pattern, Puzzle, and Peculiarity: Rhodesia’s UDI and Decolonisation in Southern Africa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About