Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction are common and potentially devastating conditions in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The prevalence of PH and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in patients with aortic stenosis and regurgitation is 15-30% and C 25%, respectively, and at least 40% in patients with mitral stenosis.1 In certain patients with pulmonary venous hypertension due to valvular cardiac disease, the elevated PVR persists or is slow to regress after valve replacement/repair as a result of remodelling of the pulmonary circulation.2 Preoperative PH is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, greater duration of hospital stay, and increased operative and long-term mortality.3 This is likely a consequence of the relationship between PH and the development of perioperative RV failure, a condition that, even with early recognition and treatment, has high morbidity and greater than 30% mortality. 4,5 Despite the critical importance of perioperative PH and RV dysfunction, there is a paucity of high-quality clinical trials addressing the perioperative management of these conditions.Milrinone, a phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor, acts by augmenting cyclic adenosine monophosphate signalling to induce pulmonary and systemic vasodilation and to increase cardiac contractility -i.e., an inodilator.2,6 Inhaled milrinone (iMil) has attracted attention in view of the preferred route of administration in the setting of PH and RV dysfunction. There is a reduction in systemic vasodilation with this approach when compared with the intravenous route, and there is evidence to suggest that iMil has superior ability to mitigate pulmonary endothelial dysfunction during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
7Lamarche et al. published retrospective data suggesting that the incidence of difficult weaning from CPB was reduced when iMil was administered before vs after CPB. 6 Until now, however, there has been a lack of prospective randomized-controlled trials evaluating the utility of iMil in this setting.In this issue of the Journal, Denault et al. present an important multicentre randomized-controlled trial examining a unique strategy for the management of perioperative PH and RV dysfunction.8 They posed the question: does prophylactic treatment with iMil before CPB facilitate separation from CPB in patients with preoperative PH? The authors studied 124 well-matched adult patients undergoing elective high-risk cardiac surgery with baseline mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure [ 30 mmHg or a PA systolic pressure [ 40 mmHg. Patients were randomized to receive a single dose of either iMil (5 mg) or placebo through an in-line ultrasonic mesh nebulizer after induction of anesthesia. Detailed hemodynamic measurements and echocardiographic data were collected.