2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The management of foot and ankle ganglia: A scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was assessed that the patients reached a post‐operative NRS during walking and running of 2.0 and 3.0, respectively, which shows the clinical efficacy of the procedure. This is in line with current literature on arthroscopic treatment [3, 12, 17]. Another clinical score that was measured in the present study was the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was assessed that the patients reached a post‐operative NRS during walking and running of 2.0 and 3.0, respectively, which shows the clinical efficacy of the procedure. This is in line with current literature on arthroscopic treatment [3, 12, 17]. Another clinical score that was measured in the present study was the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…An overall AOFAS score may be compared to the FAOS subscale of symptoms and daily functioning. When comparing these scores to the articles having been published on arthroscopic subtalar treatment for STS, similar clinical efficacy is proved [3, 12, 17, 18]. Both the pain outcomes (NRS) and other clinical PROMs of our study should however be interpreted in the light of length of follow‐up of the different studies in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation