2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The management of greenhouse gas emissions and its effects on firm performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Philip and Shi [5] postulated that financial risk corporate management teams that utilise state-dependent hedge ratios to manage carbon emissions portfolio risks on the market could generate superior hedging financial gains. Cucchiella et al [20] applied an econometric framework on the control of emissions using several Italian companies; the findings suggested that inclusion of an EMS (Environmental Management System) along with improved control of emissions spurred a firm to increased profitability through a combination of heightened demand and productivity. Concurrently, using data gathered from 941 publicly traded US manufacturing companies as well as the adoption of multilevel hypothesis testing approaches, Lucas and Noordewier [21] demonstrated that environmental management practices in dirty along with non-proactive industries generated a positive marginal impact on firm financial performance thanks to the introduction of pollution control initiatives.…”
Section: Empirical Study Results and The Development Of The Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, Philip and Shi [5] postulated that financial risk corporate management teams that utilise state-dependent hedge ratios to manage carbon emissions portfolio risks on the market could generate superior hedging financial gains. Cucchiella et al [20] applied an econometric framework on the control of emissions using several Italian companies; the findings suggested that inclusion of an EMS (Environmental Management System) along with improved control of emissions spurred a firm to increased profitability through a combination of heightened demand and productivity. Concurrently, using data gathered from 941 publicly traded US manufacturing companies as well as the adoption of multilevel hypothesis testing approaches, Lucas and Noordewier [21] demonstrated that environmental management practices in dirty along with non-proactive industries generated a positive marginal impact on firm financial performance thanks to the introduction of pollution control initiatives.…”
Section: Empirical Study Results and The Development Of The Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive frameworks are largely connected to issues of culture as well as ethics [18]. Thus, organisational green pressures from outside interested parties send signals to companies to introduce behaviours that address such demands [19][20][21][22]. This procedure is assumed to be recursive as well as self-reinforcing; accordingly, an organisational science of reasoning is represented in and conducted by individuals and is reflected in their conduct as well as the instruments and technology they employ.…”
Section: Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a sense, by adopting a good environmental strategy, firms can obtain economic and social benefits while protecting the environment (Hart and Ahuja 1996). Cucchiella, Gastaldi, & Miliacca (2017) claimed that good environmental management activities (waste management, water consumption, controlling GHG emissions, refining waste and so on) can lead to saving firm's resources, increasing productivity and income, and ultimately the value of the firm.…”
Section: Score Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This competition ultimately produces more innovation, productivity, and profitability. Cucchiella, Gastaldi, & Miliacca (2017) argue that good environmental management activities (waste management, water consumption, controlling GHG emissions, refining waste and so on) can lead to saving firms' resources, increasing productivity and income, and ultimately the value of the firm. In other words, a firm can obtain economic and social benefits while protecting the environment by adopting a good environmental strategy (Hart and Ahuja 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation