2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Manchester Large Macular Hole Study: Is it Time to Reclassify Large Macular Holes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
86
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, they suggested that ILM flaps should be reserved for macular holes >650 µm. The closure rate of our series was very high (97%) and is consistent with that reported by Ch’ng et al [7]. Even in the subgroup of eyes >650 µm, the closure rate was similar between ILM peeling and ILM flap eyes (with only 1 failure, in the ILM flap group).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, they suggested that ILM flaps should be reserved for macular holes >650 µm. The closure rate of our series was very high (97%) and is consistent with that reported by Ch’ng et al [7]. Even in the subgroup of eyes >650 µm, the closure rate was similar between ILM peeling and ILM flap eyes (with only 1 failure, in the ILM flap group).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The comparison with the traditional technique limited to ILM peeling found both supporters of ILM flap [3, 4] and detractors [5, 6]. A big step forward for the decision-making process about the choice of the most appropriate treatment for idiopathic MH >400 µm came from the Manchester Study [7]. The study showed that standard MH surgical repair (ILM peeling only) has a very high success rate (94%) in holes up to 650 µm in size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study concluded that the standard MH surgical repair gained very high success rate of up to 650 µm. 68 Various techniques in combination with ILM peelings such as ILM flaps or retinal expansion techniques have been reported to improve the success rates.…”
Section: Application Of Novel Concepts In Challenging Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postoperative uncorrected VA was measured at 3 months postoperatively with a Snellen chart and was converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA for computational purposes. The following LogMAR cutoffs were used for non-numeric VA [11]: able to count fingers = 1.7 LogMAR; able to detect hand movement = 2.0 LogMAR; light perception = 2.3 LogMAR; no light perception = 3.0 LogMAR.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%