Ground-Based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VIII 2020
DOI: 10.1117/12.2563238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MANIFEST pre-concept design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These underlying distributions correspond to the prior p(z, t) used within a Bayesian photometric redshift method; by inferring p(z, t) from the data itself, uncertainties in the prior can be propagated into the final redshift PDFs for each object. Leistedt et al (2019) extended this method to also allow the set of rest-frame SED templates used to be modified via hierarchical inference. A different approach is taken by Sánchez & Bernstein (2019), Alarcon et al (2020), who instead infer a prior probability distribution for the density of galaxies in the observed high-dimensional color space, rather than in the space of intrinsic properties, via a hierarchical inference process.…”
Section: Bayesian Hierarchical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These underlying distributions correspond to the prior p(z, t) used within a Bayesian photometric redshift method; by inferring p(z, t) from the data itself, uncertainties in the prior can be propagated into the final redshift PDFs for each object. Leistedt et al (2019) extended this method to also allow the set of rest-frame SED templates used to be modified via hierarchical inference. A different approach is taken by Sánchez & Bernstein (2019), Alarcon et al (2020), who instead infer a prior probability distribution for the density of galaxies in the observed high-dimensional color space, rather than in the space of intrinsic properties, via a hierarchical inference process.…”
Section: Bayesian Hierarchical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newman et al 2019 found that the most efficient currentlyavailable options, the DESI instrument at the Mayall Telescope (DESI Collaboration et al 2016b) and the DEIMOS spectrograph at Keck Observatory (Faber et al 2003), would take more than 1800 dark nights to conduct this survey. In contrast, the upcoming Subaru/PFS (Tamura et al 2016) would take roughly 400 dark nights, while the proposed Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (Hill et al 2018), ESO SpecTel project (Ellis & Dawson 2019), or the MANIFEST fiber-feed for the GMACS instrument on the Giant Magellan Telescope (Lawrence et al 2020) could potentially complete this fiducial survey in less than 200.…”
Section: Potential Developments In Spectroscopic Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%