2000
DOI: 10.2307/1400528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mantel Test versus Pearson's Correlation Analysis: Assessment of the Differences for Biological and Environmental Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent to which faunal provinces were correlated with clusters based on these three sets of potential explanatory variables was quantified using Mantel tests on group contrast matrices [39]. Mantel R 2 M is consistently lower than the more familiar Pearson's r 2 [40]. Specifically, a simulation study suggested that r 2 ¼ 0.25 was roughly equivalent to R 2 M ¼ 0:05, and that a large coefficient of determination (R 2 ffi 0:80) produced by trend surface analysis was equivalent to R 2 M ffi 0:25 [41].…”
Section: (C) Geological Habitat and Environmental Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which faunal provinces were correlated with clusters based on these three sets of potential explanatory variables was quantified using Mantel tests on group contrast matrices [39]. Mantel R 2 M is consistently lower than the more familiar Pearson's r 2 [40]. Specifically, a simulation study suggested that r 2 ¼ 0.25 was roughly equivalent to R 2 M ¼ 0:05, and that a large coefficient of determination (R 2 ffi 0:80) produced by trend surface analysis was equivalent to R 2 M ffi 0:25 [41].…”
Section: (C) Geological Habitat and Environmental Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mantel tests used a generalized regression to relate two matrices. Often one is a measure of spatial distance and the other a measure of temporal distance (Dutilleul et al 2000). This comparison of space and time is utilized in many restoration studies, which may explain why the citation rate for papers that use the Mantel test are disproportionate when compared to their total number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies such as Fleishman et al 2003 andBowker et al 2006 may be the next advancement in restoration ecology. With its comparison of temporal and spacial distance measures, the Mantel test has the potential to be very useful in looking at how ecosystems change or recover over time (Dutilleul et al 2000). If appropriate for the individual study designs, the field would benefit from more widespread use of this test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Normalmente, el ecólogo parte de una hipótesis nula claramente establecida, por lo que la significación se estima como la probabilidad de una sola cola obtenida a partir de las permutaciones. Es habitual que aunque el valor de la correlación sea bajo, el índice sea significativo (Dutilleul et al, 2000).…”
Section: Análisis Multivariable: El Test Y El Correlograma De Mantelunclassified