2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The many faces of stereotype threat: Group- and self-threat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
3
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
86
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, only women high in female identity completed fewer math problems after being told that a test would evaluate the performance of males and females. (In contrast, gender identification did not moderate performance when the threat was directed to the individual self rather than the gender as a whole [Wout et al, 2008]). …”
Section: The Role Of Implicit Stereotypes In Stem Performance and Parmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, only women high in female identity completed fewer math problems after being told that a test would evaluate the performance of males and females. (In contrast, gender identification did not moderate performance when the threat was directed to the individual self rather than the gender as a whole [Wout et al, 2008]). …”
Section: The Role Of Implicit Stereotypes In Stem Performance and Parmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Findings suggest that the process is bidirectional. On one hand, women who are weakly gender-identified see science stereotypes as less self-relevant and do not apply them to themselves, as illustrated in findings that women who were most strongly gender-identified were most susceptible to threatening cues (Schmader, 2002;Wout et al, 2008). To the extent that women who are most weakly genderidentified are less affected by stereotypes about women in science, they may be less constrained by structural impediments to science pursuit.…”
Section: The Moderating Role Of Gender Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important moderators among adults are gender identification, domain identification, stigma consciousness, and beliefs about intelligence (Aronson & Good, 2003). Thus, women who strongly identify with both the academic domain of mathematics (Cadinu et al, 2003;Lesko & Corpus, 2006;Pronin et al, 2004;Steinberg et al, 2012) and the female gender (Kiefer & Sekaquaptewa, 2007;Rydell et al, 2009;Schmader, 2002;Wout et al, 2008) are expected to experience stronger performance decrements compared to women who less strongly identify with those domains. Additionally, women who believe that the stereotypes regarding women and mathematics are true (Schmader et al, 2004) and that mathematical ability is a stable and fixed characteristic (Aronson & Good, 2003) are purported to show stronger stereotype threat effects.…”
Section: Developmental Aspects Of Stereotype Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, high-SES participants' scores would be equal across conditions. These hypotheses were tested using two sets of orthogonal contrasts (Wout, Danso, Jackson, & Spencer, 2007). Experimental conditions were decomposed in two orthogonal contrasts (see Cohen, Cohen, West, & Aiken, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%