Although the charge accumulation properties at organic hetero interfaces have been often discussed in terms of the energy barrier to charge injection, it is known that the interface charge due to spontaneous orientation polarization (SOP) also plays a significant role. [5,[9][10][11][12] SOP originates from the macroscopic polarization induced by partial alignment of the permanent dipole moments (PDMs) of polar organic semiconducting materials in evaporated films, [9,13,14] and dominates the charge accumulation properties below the turnon voltage of OLEDs. [5,15,16] SOP has been frequently observed in many common OLED materials, particularly emitters and electron transport materials, though it is very small in most hole transport materials. [5,[17][18][19] Recently, Bangsund et al. have demonstrated that the excess charge accumulation due to SOP can reduce the EQE of OLEDs via exciton-polaron quenching, and EQE can be enhanced by eliminating SOP in the device. [6] Thus far, substrate heating during deposition and use of materials with negligible SOP have been examined to eliminate the excess charge accumulation. [6,7] However, substrate heating can influence the properties of underlayers in the device stack, since SOP is often formed in an emission layer (EML) and electron transport layer (ETL) that are commonly deposited on a hole transport layer (HTL). On the other hand, employing negligible SOP materials limits the possible choice of materials and would not be the best for the overall performance of OLEDs. For instance, many phosphorescent and thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters also exhibit SOP, and ETL materials with negligible SOP are limited. [5,17] As an alternative method, Afolayan et al. have reported very recently that SOP is efficiently eliminated in a co-evaporated film of ETL and medium density of polyethylene. [8] They demonstrated a higher EQE and longer lifetime of a blue OLED by eliminating the SOP of the ETL. Meanwhile, the benefits of SOP in OLEDs are still controversial, e.g., SOP can improve charge injection efficiency and also affect charge blocking property. [20][21][22][23][24] Thus, exploring methods to control the charge accumulation property while keeping SOP is an important issue to optimize the device performance as well as to understand the role of SOP. In that sense, it will be intriguing to use a device stack with identical It is demonstrated that dipolar doping of hole transport layers (HTLs) controls the density and polarity of the accumulated charge at the critical interface between the HTL and the emission layer (EML) in organic lightemitting diodes (OLEDs). Dipolar doping enables spontaneous orientation polarization (SOP) even in nonpolar HTL, and consequently compensates for the negative interface charge originating from the SOP of the adjacent layer. This concept is applied to a phosphorescent OLED, where bis-4(N-carbazolyl) phenylphosphine oxide (BCPO) is employed as a polar dopant for the HTL. The net interface charge is completely compensated at ≈29.5% of d...