1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90012-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The marginal accuracy of treatment restorations: A comparative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The provisional crown margins fabricated by the indirect technique are considered to be more accurate than those fabricated by the direct technique. [1213]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provisional crown margins fabricated by the indirect technique are considered to be more accurate than those fabricated by the direct technique. [1213]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of provisional restorations before significant curing can result in distortion especially in critical areas such as restorations margins [9]. The removal technique in which restorations are left on the bench to complete polymerization also results in increased marginal discrepancies than other techniques that allow curing of the restorations on the prepared natural tooth or implant abutment [19] or the indirect fabrication of provisional restorations [19,20]. Relining techniques with or without venting of the restoration are proven to significantly improve marginal adaptation [17,19,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies appear in the dental literature comparing the marginal fit of provisional restorations made from different types of materials [8][9][10]17] and different techniques [18][19][20][21] as well as the effect of environment's temperature [22] and storage conditions [23]. Dental implant companies, on the other hand, have all tried to make the temporization phase of treatment more predictable and many have produced stock templates for their own implant systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indirect method has been associated with superior fit 11,12 and pulp protection but its disadvantage is that an intermediate impression and stone cast are required to fabricate the provisional restoration. On the contrary direct provisional restoration fabrication method efficiently uses time and materials, and also inadequate or absence of in-house lab support has led to its continued use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%