The Marginal Propensity to Earn and Consume out of Unearned Income: Evidence Using an Unusually Large Cash Grant Reform*

Abstract

In this paper, we use the rapid introduction of an unconditional cash grant (child support) in South Africa to estimate the marginal propensity to consume and earn out of unearned income. We find that the marginal propensity to earn is about −0.3 and that the marginal propensity to consume is about 0.7. Nothing of the grant appears to be saved; if anything, households dissave against future grant payments. The marginal propensities estimated here are similar to those reported in comparable papers using US data. However, they stand in contrast to some results on conditional cash transfers in other developing countries.

Old-Age Income Security and Tourism Demand: A Quasi-Experimental Study

“…They found that winning a lottery was associated with about 10% decrease in labor earnings and an 11% increase in leisure consumption. Bengtsson (2012) reported an estimate for the MPC from government cash assistance. This study examined an unconditional cash grant (child support from the government) program in South Africa-a program that gives unconditional cash benefit to the primary caregiver of the child.…”

Partial Insurance and Investments in Children

“…I divide students into two categories: within driving distance and not within driving distance of a university. 4 Regardless of how "within driving distance" is defined, respondents who live within commuting distance of a university appear to be quite similar to those who live outside of driving range. 5 However, I find that living within driving distance of a university disproportionately increases the college graduation rate of lower ability college graduates, though this difference is concentrated among men.…”

The Effect of Wealth on Individual and Household Labor Supply: Evidence from Swedish Lotteries

“…Two recent studies that consider settings similar to ours find substantially larger MPEs than we do Kimball and Shapiro (2008). estimate an MPE of -0.37 using survey responses about hypothetical lottery winnings, whereasBengtsson (2012) estimate an MPE of about -0.30 among recipients of unconditional cash grants in South Africa.19 The similarity in terms of average MPEs masks non-trivial differences in estimation and modelling. Plugging our event-study estimate for the after-tax response (column 8 ofTable 3)into the model inImbens et al (2001) gives an MPE of -0.05.…”