2018
DOI: 10.1575/1912/9489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The marine biogeochemistry of chromium isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(105 reference statements)
1
9
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A compilation of OMZ data (colored symbols in Figure ) shows a more complex relationship between Cr concentration and δ 53 Cr. Total Cr isotope data from ETNP suboxic seawater profiles (Moos, ; Moos & Boyle, ) are consistent with the Rayleigh‐type line observed in Scheiderich et al (). However, total seawater δ 53 Cr data from the eastern Atlantic OMZ by Goring‐Harford et al (), and species‐specific δ 53 Cr data from ETNP reported by this study, only partially fall on the linear trend.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A compilation of OMZ data (colored symbols in Figure ) shows a more complex relationship between Cr concentration and δ 53 Cr. Total Cr isotope data from ETNP suboxic seawater profiles (Moos, ; Moos & Boyle, ) are consistent with the Rayleigh‐type line observed in Scheiderich et al (). However, total seawater δ 53 Cr data from the eastern Atlantic OMZ by Goring‐Harford et al (), and species‐specific δ 53 Cr data from ETNP reported by this study, only partially fall on the linear trend.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Given more than a 2,400‐mile distance between these locations, such difference in δ 53 Cr may be explained by the highly heterogeneous distribution of Cr isotopes in the modern ocean. In addition, Moos () reported Cr concentration (2.27–3.21 nM) and δ 53 Cr (0.99–1.19‰) at the same station 2 and another station near our station 10 (station 7T in Moos, ), which are both lower than our values (2.37–2.58 nM Cr (VI) at station 2 and 4.6–5.27 nM total dissolved Cr at station 10). Moos () samples and our samples were collected 1 year apart (June 2013 for our samples and May 2014 for Moos, ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations