1997
DOI: 10.1086/310909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mass and Radius of 40 Eridani B from [ITAL]HIPPARCOS[/ITAL]: An Accurate Test of Stellar Interior Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the mass-radius relationship. It is possible to extrapolate both M star and R from astronomical data, for example see [99,100,101]. In all of those works, and others like them, the mass-radius relationship, as predicted by General Relativity , has been found to be in good agreement with the data.…”
Section: Implications For Compact Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This is the mass-radius relationship. It is possible to extrapolate both M star and R from astronomical data, for example see [99,100,101]. In all of those works, and others like them, the mass-radius relationship, as predicted by General Relativity , has been found to be in good agreement with the data.…”
Section: Implications For Compact Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…With the aim of comparing with astrophysical data, in Table 1 we show ten dwarf stars collected by the catalogs reported in Refs. [36][37][38], mainly emphasizing the values of mass, radius, and central density; then for the samples of Table 1 and under the assumption that the observed white dwarfs must belong to a family of equilibrium configuration without an anomalous behavior, the average value of the brane tension must be λ 84.818 MeV 4 , with a standard deviation σ 82.021 MeV 4 , showing too much dispersion in the set of the sample. This is attributed to the marked differences between the dwarf stars.…”
Section: Results Of the Numerical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, before our eyes so to speak there is the "dark matter" and a fascinating prospect for future research along this line! 28 As we have demonstrated in Bernkopf et al (2001) with the nearby bona fide thick-disk cool white dwarfs 27 For a concrete example of two famous white dwarfs we mention the nearby Sirius B and o 2 Eri B: the latter has M = 0.501 ± 0.011 M and R = 0.0136 ± 0.00024 R according to Shipman et al (1997), whereas Sirius B is more massive, M = 1.034 ± 0.026 M , and hence much smaller R = 0.0084 ± 0.00025 R (Holberg et al 1998). 28 Another, even cooler, nearby white dwarf CE 51 (=LHS 2068, V=18.07) was also recently uncovered by Ruiz & Bergeron (2001), inset at the upper left) that was only recently detected by Scholz et al (2002).…”
Section: Initial Mass Function and Luminosity Functionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This is because the dynamical mass, M W D = 0.501 ± 0.011 M , is the most accurately determined for any degenerate (Shipman et al 1997), and this white dwarf mass in turn is very close to the low mass cut-off for single star evolution that is possible within the time span of the Milky Way (cf. Weidemann & Koester 1983, Renzini & Fusi Pecci 1988, Bragaglia, Renzini, & Bergeron 1995 104 Tau: there is some contradicting information in the literature as to whether this star is a visual binary or not.…”
Section: Notes On Individual Starsmentioning
confidence: 88%