2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10828-018-9097-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Matching Analysis of relative clauses: an argument from antipronominal contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ban on pronouns functioning as complements of ní brings to mind the antipronominal contexts, that is, syntactic environments that license lexical DPs (where D° has a complement NP with 'descriptive' content) but bar pronouns (Postal 1994;Poole 2018;Pankau 2018) . Postal (1994) documented 12 such contexts in English, while Pankau (2018) enumerated seven in German . The examples in ( 23) to ( 25) are constructions that exhibit some of these contexts from English and German .…”
Section: Subcategorizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ban on pronouns functioning as complements of ní brings to mind the antipronominal contexts, that is, syntactic environments that license lexical DPs (where D° has a complement NP with 'descriptive' content) but bar pronouns (Postal 1994;Poole 2018;Pankau 2018) . Postal (1994) documented 12 such contexts in English, while Pankau (2018) enumerated seven in German . The examples in ( 23) to ( 25) are constructions that exhibit some of these contexts from English and German .…”
Section: Subcategorizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examples in ( 23) to ( 25) are constructions that exhibit some of these contexts from English and German . The English examples are from Postal (1994) while the German data are from Pankau (2018) . The German contexts are particularly interesting as five out of the seven contexts are adverbials that are expressed with PPs; see (25) .…”
Section: Subcategorizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%