2020
DOI: 10.1177/1059712320930738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The material difference in human cognition

Abstract: Humans leverage material forms for unique cognitive purposes: We recruit and incorporate them into our cognitive system, exploit them to accumulate and distribute cognitive effort, and use them to recreate phenotypic change in new individuals and generations. These purposes are exemplified by writing, a relatively recent tool that has become highly adept at eliciting specific psychological and behavioral responses in its users, capability it achieved by changing in ways that facilitated, accumulated, and distr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although cases of decrease and loss of complexity have been recorded—perhaps the result of population decline to the point where skills are lost, particularly technological knowledge related to complex “tools that are hard to learn to make, and easy to screw up” (Henrich, 2006, p. 776)—in global terms complexity tends to increase with time. There is a caveat, however: A trend toward complexity in one sector of culture may be uncorrelated with what occurs in other sectors (Overmann, 2020). For example, the 40,000-year period of morphological similarity among Homo sapiens , from the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic through modern times, does not match the strong acceleration in complexity shown in material culture from the same period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cases of decrease and loss of complexity have been recorded—perhaps the result of population decline to the point where skills are lost, particularly technological knowledge related to complex “tools that are hard to learn to make, and easy to screw up” (Henrich, 2006, p. 776)—in global terms complexity tends to increase with time. There is a caveat, however: A trend toward complexity in one sector of culture may be uncorrelated with what occurs in other sectors (Overmann, 2020). For example, the 40,000-year period of morphological similarity among Homo sapiens , from the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic through modern times, does not match the strong acceleration in complexity shown in material culture from the same period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%