“…Our study could be better designed if a negative control group was considered, especially to assess the absence of bacterial DNA of the used sampling material, even though it is supposed to be sterile [ 23 , 24 ]. However, several studies have not confirmed the sterility of the used material [ 40 , 56 , 61 , 62 ] without it interfering with the interpretation of their results. Moreover, if several samples had been taken at different sites before the uterus incision [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], such as the veterinary gloves, skin of cows, muscular wound and foetal fluids, this might have aided to the assessment of the origin of the bacteria found in the surgical site.…”