1983
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The maturation of cutaneous reflexes studied in the upper limb in man.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Cutaneous reflex responses have been recorded from forearm flexor and extensor muscles following electrical stimulation of the fingers.2. Recordings have been made from premature infants, term infants and children between the age of 6 weeks and 11 years.3. In the new-born, stimulation of the fingers elicits such a powerful reflex that, in general, individual stimuli will evoke a reflex synchronous action potential in both forearm flexor and extensor muscles.4. Individual stimuli delivered to the fing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latency of the following sharp burst, also triggered by the start of the slip, is in agreement with the long-latency excitatory response seen in cutaneomuscular reflex experiments (see the discussion above and (Evans et al 1990(Evans et al , 1991Issler and Stephens 1983;Jenner and Stephens 1982)). The response latencies (43 Ϯ 17 ms) for the burst in primary motor neurons in the monkey discussed in the preceding text (Bourdreau and Smith 2001;Picard and Smith 1992b) were similar to our data (44 Ϯ 18 ms).…”
Section: Model and Behavior Suggests Supraspinal Controlsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latency of the following sharp burst, also triggered by the start of the slip, is in agreement with the long-latency excitatory response seen in cutaneomuscular reflex experiments (see the discussion above and (Evans et al 1990(Evans et al , 1991Issler and Stephens 1983;Jenner and Stephens 1982)). The response latencies (43 Ϯ 17 ms) for the burst in primary motor neurons in the monkey discussed in the preceding text (Bourdreau and Smith 2001;Picard and Smith 1992b) were similar to our data (44 Ϯ 18 ms).…”
Section: Model and Behavior Suggests Supraspinal Controlsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Studies on cutaneomuscular reflex responses (Deuschl et al 1995;Issler and Stephens 1983;Jenner and Stephens 1982) indicate a spinal latency of 30 -50 ms, and a long latency of 55-75 ms with possible cortical involvement, for a review see Cruccu and Deuschl (2000). Triggered reactions (80 -120 ms), which can be elicited from various receptors and act on associated musculature (Cargo et al 1976;Johansson and Westling 1984b;1988b;Schmidt and Lee, 1999), involve higher centers and fit well with the functional nature of the GF increase studied here.…”
Section: Model and Behavior Suggests Supraspinal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of cutaneous reflexes shows a similar pattern to that of the phasic stretch reflex, with an increasing threshold with age (Fitzgerald, Shaw & MacIntosh, 1988) and a decreasing magnitude of the early component of the response evoked by a standard stimulus over the first year (Issler & Stephens, 1983 (Gregory & Proske, 1988). In the cat Skoglund (1960) demonstrated rapidly adapting responses to stretch at birth, and Gregory & Proske (1988) noted increased sensitivity and rate of firing of muscle spindle afferents to standard muscle stretch with increasing age, which would suggest the reverse of an increase of threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In both of the age groups tested here, the majority of visual and manual responses measured emerged between 1 and 4 seconds after stimulus presentation (see Figure 2). The latency of these responses argues against a spinal reflex, as the muscular activity associated with cutaneous spinal reflex responses is typically observed at a latency of around 20 ms, even in the newborn infant (see Issler & Stephens, 1983). Another indication that these responses were under cortical control comes from the comparison of the speed of 6.5-month-olds' responses against that of a baseline group who were not presented with any vibrotactile stimulation (Experiment 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%