1995
DOI: 10.4310/jdg/1214456216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The maximum principle for hypersurfaces with vanishing curvature functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a proof of (i), see [3], while for (ii), see [10]. From the above proposition, the requirements on p and rank(A) in the main theorems ensure ellipticity.…”
Section: Lemma 21 Let {E I } Be the Principal Directions Associatedmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For a proof of (i), see [3], while for (ii), see [10]. From the above proposition, the requirements on p and rank(A) in the main theorems ensure ellipticity.…”
Section: Lemma 21 Let {E I } Be the Principal Directions Associatedmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since we are assuming that the profile curve is parametrized by the arc length, the rank of the second fundamental form of the immersion ξ : M p+q+1 → R p+q+2 is greater than min{p, q} ≥ r > r − 1. Therefore, the associated Jacobi operator J r−1 is an elliptic operator (see [9]). …”
Section: Classification Of the Invariant Hypersurfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, k i n are the eigenvalues of A = −dg, where g: M n → S n (1) is the Gauss map of the hypersurface. Reilly showed in [8] that orientable hypersurfaces with S r +1 = 0 are critical points of the functional A breakthrough in the study of these hypersurfaces occurred in 1995 when Hounie and Leite [6,7] found conditions for the linearization of the partial differential equation S r +1 = 0 to be an elliptic equation. This linearization involves a second order differential operator L r (see the definition of L r 2 in Section 2) and the Hounie-Leite conditions read as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%