1933
DOI: 10.1037/11351-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The maze test and mental differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

1935
1935
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognitive reflectivity. Two different tasks were employed to measure cognitive reflectivity: the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT; Kagan et al, 1964), as modified by Weintraub (1968), and the Porteus (1933) Maze Test (Ferrarese, 1981), The modified MFFT presents 24 sets of eight very similar but not identical pictures of familiar objects projected on a screen. Subjects are required to identify the one picture that matches a standard stimulus presented simultaneously on the screen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cognitive reflectivity. Two different tasks were employed to measure cognitive reflectivity: the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT; Kagan et al, 1964), as modified by Weintraub (1968), and the Porteus (1933) Maze Test (Ferrarese, 1981), The modified MFFT presents 24 sets of eight very similar but not identical pictures of familiar objects projected on a screen. Subjects are required to identify the one picture that matches a standard stimulus presented simultaneously on the screen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate reflectiveness, as indexed by performance on such measures as the Porteus (1933) Maze Test and the Matching Familiar Figures Test (Kagan, Rosman, Day, Albert & Phelps, 1964), has been linked to academic learning difficulties (e.g. Egeland, 1974) and problem-solving anxiety and self-doubt (Block, Block & Harrington, 1974), as well as to aggression and delinquency (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising, since by the inclusion of the adult mazes a two-year higher rating is made possible with no corresponding penalty for failure. We have been unable to discover any discussion of the problem of the inclusion of the adult mazes other than that in Porteus (25,186) which refers to the single adult test in the new maze series. Our mazes were rescored using the criteria suggested in this reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Porteus Mazes (Porteus, 1933) were used to measure possible task generalization. While the Mazes have been questioned as an index of impulsivity (O'Keefe, 1975) the qualitative (Q) scores may nevertheless be considered as a measure of failure to following instructions and of mistakes in task execution (Bugental, Whalen, & Henker, 1977).…”
Section: Procedures and Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%