2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1572-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MCH Navigator: Tools for MCH Workforce Development and Lifelong Learning

Abstract: Maternal and child health (MCH) leadership requires an understanding of MCH populations and systems as well as continuous pursuit of new knowledge and skills. This paper describes the development, structure, and implementation of the MCH Navigator, a web-based portal for ongoing education and training for a diverse MCH workforce. Early development of the portal focused on organizing high quality, free, web-based learning opportunities that support established learning competencies without duplicating existing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the MCH scholars, these seminars reach multiple tiers of audiences, such as: other master and doctoral level students concentrating in MCH; students, faculty and staff across the College of Public Health and the greater university; and community partners and the MCH/public health workforce. Evaluation activities: The COE employs a rigorous process and outcome evaluation utilizing various data sources including pre-post assessments of the MCH Navigator (Grason et al, 2015 ), leadership/topical seminar evaluations, logic model of individualized leadership development (goals, objectives, deliverables), academic-community research internships evaluations, exit surveys, and reflection products to support continuous program quality improvement efforts and inform reporting requirements, and other dissemination activities. Of note, although the COE develops, administers, and maintains these varied evaluation instruments, prior to these pragmatic adaptions as applied to CFIR, implementation factors were not explicitly included in existing evaluation instruments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the MCH scholars, these seminars reach multiple tiers of audiences, such as: other master and doctoral level students concentrating in MCH; students, faculty and staff across the College of Public Health and the greater university; and community partners and the MCH/public health workforce. Evaluation activities: The COE employs a rigorous process and outcome evaluation utilizing various data sources including pre-post assessments of the MCH Navigator (Grason et al, 2015 ), leadership/topical seminar evaluations, logic model of individualized leadership development (goals, objectives, deliverables), academic-community research internships evaluations, exit surveys, and reflection products to support continuous program quality improvement efforts and inform reporting requirements, and other dissemination activities. Of note, although the COE develops, administers, and maintains these varied evaluation instruments, prior to these pragmatic adaptions as applied to CFIR, implementation factors were not explicitly included in existing evaluation instruments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%