2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mean trophic level of Uruguayan landings during the period 1990–2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
2
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
26
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Pauly et al (2000a) also found major changes in the fi sh communities and landings to have occurred in the northeast Atlantic, where trophic level plunged from a peak of nearly 3.7 in 1965 to only 2.8 in 1997. The increase we found in the landings data, from 122 160 t in 2002 to 169 192 t in 2011 was slightly stronger than the increase recorded by Milessi et al (2005) for Uruguayan landings during the period 1990-2001. The increased total landings may be related in part to technical innovation and the development of new fi shing gear designs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Pauly et al (2000a) also found major changes in the fi sh communities and landings to have occurred in the northeast Atlantic, where trophic level plunged from a peak of nearly 3.7 in 1965 to only 2.8 in 1997. The increase we found in the landings data, from 122 160 t in 2002 to 169 192 t in 2011 was slightly stronger than the increase recorded by Milessi et al (2005) for Uruguayan landings during the period 1990-2001. The increased total landings may be related in part to technical innovation and the development of new fi shing gear designs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…1b), for Uruguayan and Chilean landings the largest catches were made when the species with the highest trophic levels were caught (Milessi et al, 2005;Arancibia and Neira, 2005) and the TLm values declined at rates of 0.28 and 0.175 (without horse mackerel) per decade respectively. For Portugal too, the landings TLm declined at a lower rate, 0.05 per decade (Baeta et al, 2009), which is quite different from the situation off Angola, where the TLm fluctuated over five decades (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The decadal differences in the landing profiles are likely to be associated with strong declines in all traditional fishery resources (i.e. M. furnieri, C. guatucupa, M. schmitti) as a result of the fishing down marine food webs process in the ArgentineaneUruguayan Common Fishing Zone (Milessi et al, 2005;Jaureguizar and Milessi, 2008). The main coastal fishery resource, M. furnieri, is targeted by different fisheries (artisanal, coastal and shelf) and the available information indicates that it is in a critical state Carozza, 2010), overexploited (Vasconcellos and Haimovichi, 2006), or fully exploited at a higher level than its biological potential (Carozza and Rey, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%