1960
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1960.62.1.02a00040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Meaning of Kinship Terms1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
4

Year Published

1966
1966
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of analysis was first attempted by Good enough (1956), an anthropologist who was interested in comparing the kinship terms and relations of various cultures. Others who have done related studies of this semantic field include Wallace and Atkins (1960), Romney and D'Andrade (1964), and Haviland and Clark (in pre,ss).…”
Section: Semantics: Meanings Of Individual Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of analysis was first attempted by Good enough (1956), an anthropologist who was interested in comparing the kinship terms and relations of various cultures. Others who have done related studies of this semantic field include Wallace and Atkins (1960), Romney and D'Andrade (1964), and Haviland and Clark (in pre,ss).…”
Section: Semantics: Meanings Of Individual Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graphic representation of this i s called a componential paradigm or solution. Wallace and Atkins' (1960), Romney and D'Andrade's (1 964), and Goodenough's (1 965) componential paradigms for some WA, the first published of the three, omits consideration of both affinal terms and bound forms such as great-, half-, step-, etc. Wallace and Atkins present their solution as illustrative of the method of analysis and make no other claim for it. Romney and D'Andrade weigh their paradigm RD against WA and conclude on the basis of results of independent behavioral tests that RD is more "psychologically" or "cognitively" valid.…”
Section: Three Componential Analyses O F American Kin Terms-wallace Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that their study produced a kinship diagram that is more adequate (closer to the patterns produced by American respondents) than the componential analysis of Wallace and Atkins (1960). The dimension of "reciprocity" was regarded as the chief ingredient accounting for the difference between the two analyses.…”
Section: Cognitive Aspects Of American Kin Termsmentioning
confidence: 97%