1986
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1986.10475415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Meaning of Kurtosis: Darlington Reexamined

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
24

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
63
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Finecan (1964) and Moors (1986) showed that kurtosis may be interpreted as measuring the shift of probability mass away from Ϯ toward either the middle of the distribution or the tails, the latter case giving rise to fat-tailed distributions (see also Balanda and MacGillivray 1988 for a useful discussion). Moreover, the kurtosis ␥ 2 (F) maintains a stochastic ordering of distribution in the sense that F ՞ G if ␥ 2 (F) Յ ␥ 2 (G).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finecan (1964) and Moors (1986) showed that kurtosis may be interpreted as measuring the shift of probability mass away from Ϯ toward either the middle of the distribution or the tails, the latter case giving rise to fat-tailed distributions (see also Balanda and MacGillivray 1988 for a useful discussion). Moreover, the kurtosis ␥ 2 (F) maintains a stochastic ordering of distribution in the sense that F ՞ G if ␥ 2 (F) Յ ␥ 2 (G).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We note that excess kurtosis, κ e (which, as noted previously, is proportional to the Binder cumulant, U 4 = −κ e /3, for non-periodic random variables) has long been considered as a measure for unimodality versus bimodality in statistics literature, where its usefulness and limitations have also been discussed extensively [98][99][100]. In the case of two-point distributions (equivalent to the twostate model introduced in Appendix B), the Binder cumulant can be shown to take large negative values as the distribution becomes less symmetric (i.e., as the probability density at one of the points or, equivalently, the bimodal ratio, R Ψ , is decreased), and, eventually, tend to negative infinity as the onset of bimodality is approached (R Ψ → 0) [98].…”
Section: F Onset Of Population Splitting: Binder Cumulantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and is more difficult (Havilcek and Crain, 1988;Moors, 1986;Chissan, 1970) to interpret. It is a statistical measure of the concentration of the distribution around the mean.…”
Section: Moments Of a Random Variable: Skewness And Kurtosismentioning
confidence: 97%