2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The meaning of maxima and minima in first order reversal curves: Determining the interaction between species in a sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These noisy tails are often seen in experimental FORCs and appear also in our models. The cause in both cases is the same, and are due to slightly different switching fields observed across multiple reversal curves (Moreno-Ortega et al, 2022).…”
Section: Equant Truncated-octahedral Particles Of Magnetitementioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These noisy tails are often seen in experimental FORCs and appear also in our models. The cause in both cases is the same, and are due to slightly different switching fields observed across multiple reversal curves (Moreno-Ortega et al, 2022).…”
Section: Equant Truncated-octahedral Particles Of Magnetitementioning
confidence: 86%
“…These differences are caused by the stronger planar anisotropy of the oblate particles, which encourages the spontaneous formation of SV states from the saturated SD states as the field is reduced. Similarly the positive lobe below the B c axis corresponds to nucleation of the SV state (Dumas et al, 2007;Moreno-Ortega et al, 2022). However, nucleation of the SV state does not occur directly from SD, but via an inhomogeneous magnetic structure where there is some flowering of the surface magnetization together with planar rotation of the magnetization within the particles.…”
Section: Oblate Truncated-octahedral Particles Of Magnetitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One source of these features could be polynomial ringing—where the second‐degree polynomial approximation to the magnetization surface in a series of FORC curves results in overfitting. Analysis of the polynomial fit leads us to conclude that these features are more likely due to slightly different switching fields observed across multiple reversal curves (Moreno et al., 2022). We note that small scale features such as VNAPs and the mottled regions highlighted above may be further smoothed in natural specimens that contain a broader distribution of size and shape than presented in this study.…”
Section: Simulated Forc Diagrams For Random Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences are caused by the stronger planar anisotropy of the oblate particles, which encourages the spontaneous formation of SV states from the saturated SD states as the field is reduced. Similarly the positive lobe below the B c axis corresponds to nucleation of the SV state (Dumas et al, 2007;Moreno et al, 2022). However, nucleation of the SV state does not occur directly from SD, but via an inhomogeneous magnetic structure where there is some flowering of the surface magnetization together with planar rotation of the magnetization within the particles.…”
Section: Oblate Truncated-octahedral Particles Of Magnetitementioning
confidence: 99%