The means are the end: Complexity science in organizational research.

Aiken, Juliet R.; Hanges, Paul J.; Chen, Tiancheng

doi:10.1037/0000115-006

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With respect to multilevel theory, the Humphrey and LeBreton (2019) handbook focuses on a wide range of important and timely topics. For example, chapters in the volume discuss the criticality of incorporating more considerations of dynamic properties (Cronin & Vancouver, 2019) and complexity science (Aiken, Hanges, & Chen, 2019) in developing theory about multilevel phenomena. Ployhart and Hendricks (2019) address the need for work in macro-oriented research on microfoundations to more directly consider multilevel perspectives; Gully and Phillips (2019) note the challenges with determining the appropriate level of analysis to focus theorizing; and Mathieu and Luciano (2019) provide an overview of extant perspectives on emergent phenomena and outline important ways in which work in this area can more explicitly incorporate theorizing related to temporal dynamics.…”

Section: The Presentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multilevel Methods and Statistics: The Next Frontier

Eckardt

Yammarino

Dionne

et al. 2020

Organizational Research Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to take stock of extant multilevel methodological and statistical work and highlight needed areas for future research. A basic overview of the history and progression of multilevel methods and statistics in the organizational sciences is provided, as well as a discussion of recent developments to summarize the current state of the science. The eight articles in the current feature topic are also summarized and integrated to depict several themes and directions for the next wave of multilevel methods and statistics. Last, to highlight what still needs to be accomplished in the field, several unresolved issues and future research topics are noted and an agenda related to future multilevel work is discussed.

show abstract

Section: The Presentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multilevel Methods and Statistics: The Next Frontier

Eckardt

Yammarino

Dionne

et al. 2020

Organizational Research Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Multilevel empirical research: A call for more mixed-methods approaches

Hernaus,

Potočnik,

Lira

et al. 2024

European Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Leaders, Followers, and Culture

Hanges,

Forgo,

Butler

2024

The Oxford Handbook of Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this chapter, we highlight the role that DeRue’s (2011) leader–follower double-interact model plays as a critical, but previously unexplored, mediator for the societal culture-leader/follower interaction relationships. In the proposed model described in this chapter, societal culture influences the frequency and dispersion with which group members can temporarily enact and practice their leadership styles (i.e., DeRue’s double-interact patterns). As a result of these cultural modifications, the double-interact patterns will affect (1) leader and follower schema content, structure, and accessibility; (2) leader and follower identity development and centrality; and (3) regulatory fit or nonfit among group members. All of these factors have been shown to be very important factors affecting leader–follower interactions. Throughout this chapter, several hypotheses for future research are discussed.

show abstract

The means are the end: Complexity science in organizational research.

Cited by 3 publications

References 55 publications

Multilevel Methods and Statistics: The Next Frontier

Multilevel Methods and Statistics: The Next Frontier

Multilevel empirical research: A call for more mixed-methods approaches

Leaders, Followers, and Culture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About