1998
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measure of stage of readiness to change: Some psychometric considerations.

Abstract: Previous research in the smoking cessation literature has shown that the key component of the transtheoretical model of change, the stage of readiness to change, is a valid independent measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stage of readiness to quit, an extension by Crittenden et al (Crittenden et al, 1994 of Prochaska and DiClemente's stage measure (DiClemente et al, 1991;Prochaska et al, 1992), had the following categories: 1) planning no change in smoking ever; 2) seriously thinking of cutting down but not quitting; 3) seriously thinking of quitting but not within the next 6 months; 4) contemplating quitting within the next 6 months; 5) preparing for quitting; and 6) action (abstinent). The stage, motivation, confidence, and action scales have adequate reliability and validity, as described previously (Crittenden et al, 1994Morera et al, 1998). Alpha reliability for the self-efficacy scale is .87.…”
Section: Time-varying Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stage of readiness to quit, an extension by Crittenden et al (Crittenden et al, 1994 of Prochaska and DiClemente's stage measure (DiClemente et al, 1991;Prochaska et al, 1992), had the following categories: 1) planning no change in smoking ever; 2) seriously thinking of cutting down but not quitting; 3) seriously thinking of quitting but not within the next 6 months; 4) contemplating quitting within the next 6 months; 5) preparing for quitting; and 6) action (abstinent). The stage, motivation, confidence, and action scales have adequate reliability and validity, as described previously (Crittenden et al, 1994Morera et al, 1998). Alpha reliability for the self-efficacy scale is .87.…”
Section: Time-varying Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, individual readiness studies were (and continue to be) published in the health, psychology, and medical literature (Block & Keller, 1998;Morera et al, 1998;Prochaska, Redding, & Evers, 1997) and are primarily focused on ceasing harmful health habits (such as smoking and drugs) and starting positive ones (such as weight management, nutritional meals, and sunscreen use). In the HRD and organizational psychology literature, many change models have included readiness components, but most do not include specific depth related to this readiness component.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scales have adequate reliability and validity. 37,40,41 The independent variables were study condition (baseline and control vs experimental) and exposure to smoking cessation intervention components (assessed in the postintervention interviews). The clinic service where the women had their medical visits (prenatal, family planning, well-child) was a control variable, because of variation across the services in the prevalence of smoking interventions offered in normal practice 35 and in pre-and postvisit smoking outcomes.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%