1994
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<1823:tmapoe>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement and Parameterization of Effective Radius of Droplets in Warm Stratocumulus Clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

84
773
10
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 812 publications
(869 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
84
773
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In satellite remote-sensing DSDs are often described using theoretical distributions that fit well with in situ observations, in addition to being mathematically convenient (Deirmendjian, 1964;Tampieri and Tomasi, 1976;Martin et al, 1994;Miles et al, 2000). A popular theoretical DSD is the gamma distribution proposed by Hansen and Travis (1974):…”
Section: Cloud Microphysical and Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In satellite remote-sensing DSDs are often described using theoretical distributions that fit well with in situ observations, in addition to being mathematically convenient (Deirmendjian, 1964;Tampieri and Tomasi, 1976;Martin et al, 1994;Miles et al, 2000). A popular theoretical DSD is the gamma distribution proposed by Hansen and Travis (1974):…”
Section: Cloud Microphysical and Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N a is aerosol number concentrations in the size range 0.05-1.50 mm radius in m À3 [Martin et al, 1994]. This cloud droplet number density is fed to a cloud module with explicit microphysical processes [Lohmann and Roeckner, 1996] to treat the cloud-aerosol interactions.…”
Section: Aerosol Activation and Cloud Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of cloud droplet concentration to aerosol particle concentration was much lower than that observed by Twomey and Warner (1967) or by Pueschel et al (1986). Martin et al (1994) compared concentrations of cloud droplets (0.5 to 47 pm diameter) in warm st:ratocumulus clouds to concentrations of aerosol particles (0.1 to 3 pm diameter:) in air just below cloud base (Figure 11). At low aerosol particles characteristic of air relatively free of anthropogenic influence the concentration of cloud drops was nearly equal to the concentration of aerosol particles, whereas thlere was a marked fall off at higher aerosol particle concentrations ( 2 400 cm-3) characteristic of anthropogenic influence.…”
Section: "*7----------mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These distributions are expressed in terms oi the aerosol mass loading, so this was transformed to a number concentration1 by assuming a log-normal size distribution. This was done in order to capitalize on the aircraft data obtained by Martin et al (1994) for boundary layer stratocumulus clouds in several regions of the globe. Martin et al showed that there is a good correlation between the number concentration of aerosols in the sub-cloud layer and the number of cloud drops ( Figure 11).…”
Section: Studies With Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%