2000
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3.777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement Artifact in the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire

Abstract: This study empirically examined the debate in the literature regarding the dimensionality of the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire. The sample comprised 803 employees from organizations in the information technology and hospitality industries. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire appears to have a two-factor structure, with one factor consisting of positively worded items and the other factor, negatively worded items. Scores on both factors correlated signi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Job satisfaction: The three positively-worded items from the job diagnostics survey (Hackman and Oldham, 1975) were used to assess general job satisfaction. The negatively worded items were not used because they reflect intent to quit (Caught et al, 2000), a variable measured specifically and separately in this study. It was decided that the negatively worded items could inappropriately influence the relationship between satisfaction and intention to quit and corrupt the relationships of those variables with other variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job satisfaction: The three positively-worded items from the job diagnostics survey (Hackman and Oldham, 1975) were used to assess general job satisfaction. The negatively worded items were not used because they reflect intent to quit (Caught et al, 2000), a variable measured specifically and separately in this study. It was decided that the negatively worded items could inappropriately influence the relationship between satisfaction and intention to quit and corrupt the relationships of those variables with other variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, organisational commitment is the employees' state of being committed to assist in the achievement of the organisation's goals and involves the employees' levels of identification, involvement, and loyalty (Caught & Shadur, 2000). It is a state of being, in which organisational members are bound by their actions and beliefs that sustain their activities and their own involvement in the organisation (Miller & Lee, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OC is defined as the employees' state of being committed to assist in the achievement of the organization's goals, and involves the employees' levels of identification, involvement, and loyalty (Caught & Shadur, 2000). The reason why the researcher focuses on the antecedents of OC is because OC is seen as a prime explanation for why some desire to remain employed while others do not (Allen & Meyer, 1990;Mowday, Porter, & Steers, 1982;Peyyer, Jordan, Firms, & Travaglione, 2010;Steers, 1977) or why some have a high work performance while others do not (Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch, & Topolnytsky, 2002;Phipps, Prieto, & Ndinguri, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%