1986
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods

Abstract: The measurement of subjective pain intensity continues to be important to both researchers and clinicians. Although several scales are currently used to assess the intensity construct, it remains unclear which of these provides the most precise, replicable, and predictively valid measure. Five criteria for judging intensity scales have been considered in previous research: ease of administration of scoring; relative rates of incorrect responding; sensitivity as defined by the number of available response categ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

29
1,495
2
91

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,747 publications
(1,673 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
29
1,495
2
91
Order By: Relevance
“…The Centre for Epidemiological Studies – Depression Scale (CES‐D) was used to measure levels of depressive symptomatology, ranging from 0 to 60 (indicating a low to high level of depressive state) (Radloff, 1977). The psychometric properties of the NRS‐11 (Jensen et al., 1986), reliability and validity of the SF‐36 (Ware, 2000) and test–retest reliability and validity of the CES‐D (Devins et al., 1988) have been investigated with good results. The presence and severity of comorbid conditions (Table 1) were measured using a previously validated inventory (Vermeulen, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Centre for Epidemiological Studies – Depression Scale (CES‐D) was used to measure levels of depressive symptomatology, ranging from 0 to 60 (indicating a low to high level of depressive state) (Radloff, 1977). The psychometric properties of the NRS‐11 (Jensen et al., 1986), reliability and validity of the SF‐36 (Ware, 2000) and test–retest reliability and validity of the CES‐D (Devins et al., 1988) have been investigated with good results. The presence and severity of comorbid conditions (Table 1) were measured using a previously validated inventory (Vermeulen, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severity of gastrointestinal symptoms, Raynaud's phenomenon, and breathing problems in the past week was measured using 11-point numerical rating scales (NRS; 0 Ï­ no disease, 10 Ï­ very severe disease) derived from the visual analog scales (VAS) in the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (30). NRS measures perform similarly to VAS measures, but are generally easier to score (31).…”
Section: Significance and Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensity of pain Pain intensity was assessed using numerical rating scales (NRS), 32 ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable). Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their present pain when most intense and when least intense.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%