The Measurement of Cohesion and its Relationship to Dimensions of Self-Disclosure in Classroom Settings

Rosenfeld, Lawrence B.; Gilbert, Joanne

doi:10.1177/104649648902000301

Cited by 46 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Cronbach's alpha was .92 [M = 48.23, SD = 15.79). Rosenfeld and Gilbert's (1989) 10-item Cohesion Scale designed for classroom settings was used. Alpha was .96 [M = 38.16, SD = 8.92).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Small group relational satisfaction scale: Development, reliability and validity

2001

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Cronbach's alpha was .92 [M = 48.23, SD = 15.79). Rosenfeld and Gilbert's (1989) 10-item Cohesion Scale designed for classroom settings was used. Alpha was .96 [M = 38.16, SD = 8.92).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Small group relational satisfaction scale: Development, reliability and validity

2001

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Group cohesion is viewed as the single strongest predictor of group behavior (Evans and Dion 1991;Goodman et al 1987;Guzzo and Shea 1992;Guzzo and Dickson 1996;Mullen and Copper 1994) and plays a central role in social psychology, group dynamics, military psychology, sport psychology, educational psychology, psychological addiction, and group support systems (Turner et al 1992;Stokes 1983;Griffith and Greenlees 1993;Widmeyer and Williams 1991;Rosenfeld and Gilbert 1989;Lando and McGovern 1991;Chidambaram 1996). Indeed, group cohesion has been an active part of research in almost every domain of psychology that deals with group behavior (Chin et al 1999).…”

Section: Gss Cohesion and Decision Scheme Satisfactionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: The Differential Effect of GSS Restrictiveness on Process Satisfaction and Group Cohesion

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

That Group Support Systems (GSS) can enhance group performance has been revealed by several studies. Studies have also demonstrated a favorable influence on process satisfaction. However, GSS research has drawn heavily from a perspective that may limit the full range of phenomena at play in group meetings. In addition to the micro-level interaction that occurs in GSS-supported group meetings, group participants are also likely influenced by other groups and macro-level institutions outside any given small group meeting. We focus on two processes in particular. Group performance perceptions such as process satisfaction appear to be driven by reproduction of institutionally relevant procedures while group interaction perceptions such as cohesion are driven by micro-level group interaction. This study more fully considers the impact on group interaction variables by varying levels of GSS restrictiveness (i.e., facilitation and process structuring) and assessing the effect that these may have on perceptions of group cohesion and process satisfaction. We develop and test a causal path model, finding that groups in the more restrictive treatment perceived that they made more appropriate use of the GSS, leading to higher process satisfaction than did those in the less restrictive treatment. However, these groups are also characterized by reduced group interaction, and also expressed lower perceived cohesion than did those in the non-restrictive treatment. Theoretical discussions of why this may have occurred are offered.

show abstract

“…The interest in group cohesion pervades several research areas, including social psychology, group dynamics, and computermediated communication ( [21] and [15]). Perceived cohesiveness encompasses an individual's sense of belonging to a particular group and his/her feelings of morale associated with membership in the group [2].…”

Section: Group Cohesionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multimodal corpus of multi-party meetings for automatic social behavior analysis and personality traits detection

Mana

Lepri

Chippendale

et al. 2007

Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Tagging, Mining and Retrieval of Human Related Activity Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes an automatically annotated multimodal corpus of multi-party meetings. The corpus provides for each subject involved in the experimental sessions information on her/his social behavior and personality traits, as well as audiovisual cues (speech rate, pitch and energy, head orientation, head, hand and body fidgeting). The corpus is based on the audio and video recordings of thirteen sessions, which took place in a lab setting equipped with cameras and microphones. Our main concern in collecting this corpus was to investigate the possibility of creating a system capable of automatically analyzing social behaviors and predicting personality traits using audio-visual cues.

show abstract

The Measurement of Cohesion and its Relationship to Dimensions of Self-Disclosure in Classroom Settings

Cited by 46 publications

References 29 publications

Small group relational satisfaction scale: Development, reliability and validity

Small group relational satisfaction scale: Development, reliability and validity

Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: The Differential Effect of GSS Restrictiveness on Process Satisfaction and Group Cohesion

Multimodal corpus of multi-party meetings for automatic social behavior analysis and personality traits detection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About