2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00149-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement of effectuation: highlighting research tensions and opportunities for the future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
91
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
7
91
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the existing literature contains significant tensions with respect to the proper way of conceptualizing the dimensions and measuring the effectuation and causation constructs (McKelvie et al, 2020). In the Methods section, we justified our choice of selecting the instrument of Chandler et al (2011).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the existing literature contains significant tensions with respect to the proper way of conceptualizing the dimensions and measuring the effectuation and causation constructs (McKelvie et al, 2020). In the Methods section, we justified our choice of selecting the instrument of Chandler et al (2011).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPARK Interfax database contains constantly updated data from official government databases about all registered companies in Russia (http://www.spark-interfax.ru/promo/en). 2 We acknowledge the significant tensions in the literature regarding the proper way of measurement of effectuation and causation constructs (e.g., McKelvie et al, 2020). In practice, the two most broadly used survey instruments for these constructs were proposed in Chandler et al (2011) and Brettel et al (2012).…”
Section: Oleksiy Osiyevskyymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectuation research has been developing for about two decades and is recognized as an important paradigmatic shift in understanding entrepreneurial decision-making and behavior (Alsos, Clausen, Mauer, Read, & Sarasvathy, 2019). Despite its considerable progress as a theory, many of its concepts require theoretical and empirical improvements (Arend, Sarooghi, & Burkemper, 2015; McKelvie, Chandler, DeTienne, & Johansson, 2019; Read, Sarasvathy, Dew, & Wiltbank, 2016). For instance, while effectual networks are the key building blocks of the effectuation process aiding decision-making under highly uncertain conditions (see e.g., Sarasvathy & Dew, 2003; 2005), our knowledge about their formation and constitution is still incomplete (Kerr & Coviello, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, applied effectuation studies simply operationalise the core concepts (Chandler et al 2011;Brettel et al 2012), apply, or test, the core concepts (e.g. Sarasvathy and Kotha 2001;Bhowmick 2011;Dew et al 2015;Reymen et al 2015;Parida et al 2016;Jiang and Rüling 2019) or present secondary analyses (Read et al 2009a;Fisher 2012;Perry et al 2012;Mauer 2014;Welter et al 2016;Matalamäki 2017;Mansoori and Lackéus 2019;McKelvie et al 2019). 6 Some researchers have proposed minor modifications to effectuation concepts while retaining the basic framework (e.g.…”
Section: Methodological Approach: Analysing Effectuation Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%