1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-7721-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement of Efficiency of Production

Abstract: No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means without written permission of the publisher.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
772
0
42

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,444 publications
(819 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
772
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…18 As expected, deleting each of these years in turn from the data set did not alter the values of * for the remaining years. Hence these years are akin to DMU C in Figure 2.…”
Section: Tables 1 and 2 Near Heresupporting
confidence: 63%
“…18 As expected, deleting each of these years in turn from the data set did not alter the values of * for the remaining years. Hence these years are akin to DMU C in Figure 2.…”
Section: Tables 1 and 2 Near Heresupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The constructed relative efficiency frontiers are non-statistical or non-parametric in the sense that they are constructed through the envelopment of the decision-making units (DMUs), with the best-performance DMUs forming the frontier. Within this methodological framework, the overall technical efficiency is decomposed into pure technical and scale efficiencies, a method initially suggested by Farrell (1957) and later extended by Banker, Charnes, and Cooper (1984), and Färe, Grosskopf, and Lovell (1985). Empirical applications of the decomposition of overall technical efficiency to banking include but are not limited to those by Rangan et al (1988), Aly et al (1990), and Drake and Hall (2003).…”
Section: Methodology Nonparametric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DEA, each bank is assigned an efficiency score between 0 and 1, with higher scores indicating a more efficient bank, relatively to other banks in the sample. A number of studies have addressed DEA models and equations (see for example; Coelli, 1992;1994;Fare, 1985;Farrell, 1957;Seiford, 1990;1996). This study used the Charnes et al (1978) of DEA model to evaluate the performance of listed Bahraini Banks.…”
Section: B) Data Envelopment Analysis (Dea) Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%