2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00351-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

69
1,711
9
196

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,858 publications
(1,985 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
69
1,711
9
196
Order By: Relevance
“…Imbalance between effort and reward elicits negative emotions, such as injustice, disappointment and sustained stress, and may in the long run lead to increased risk of illness due to strain reactions [41]. The theoretical basis is social reciprocity, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Imbalance between effort and reward elicits negative emotions, such as injustice, disappointment and sustained stress, and may in the long run lead to increased risk of illness due to strain reactions [41]. The theoretical basis is social reciprocity, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overcommitment (OC) was assessed by six items measuring patterns of coping with work demands. The total score for OC ranges from 6 to 24, where a high score indicates that the subject is likely to experience OC at work [41].…”
Section: Work Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Job Content Questionnaire subscales were used to measure job demand (five items) and job control (nine items) (Karasek et al, 1998); job strain was calculated as the ratio of demand to control. The Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) Questionnaire was used to measure effort (six items) and reward (11 items); an ERI ratio was calculated as the ratio of effort to reward with a correction factor applied to resolve the number difference in the two scales (Siegrist et al, 2004). Safety climate was measured by an 11-item questionnaire assessing the employee's perceptions about management commitment for worker safety, safety communication with supervisors and coworkers, and work environment related to safety (Felknor et al, 2000).…”
Section: Study Variables and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effort-reward imbalance (ERI) at work was measured using 3 scales [38,39]. Effort is based on 6 items dealing with aspects of the work environment that are perceived as demanding.…”
Section: Work Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score ranges from 11 to 55; the lower the reward score the lesser the perceived reward at work. The ratio of effort/reward indicates imbalance at work when the ERI quota is ≥1 [38]. Over commitment (OC) was assessed by 6 items measuring patterns of coping with work demands.…”
Section: Work Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%