2019
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1604660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement of endometrial volume and sub-endometrial vascularity to replace the traditional endometrial thickness as predictors of in-vitro fertilization success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
13
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we considered 3ml as the cut-off value of endometrial volume and divided it into two groups with scores of 0 and 1 respectively. Ahmed et al reported that endometrial volume can be a candidate predictor of in-vitro fertilization success to replace the traditional endometrial thickness, because it was significantly differenced between pregnant and non-pregnant women on day of triggering and embryo transfer ( 26 ). On the contrary, Assen et al analyzed 142 patients in their study and found that endometrial volume assessed by 3D transvaginal ultrasound was not a useful tool for predicting pregnancy in single blastocyst embryo transfer cycles and the AUC was 0.48 ( 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we considered 3ml as the cut-off value of endometrial volume and divided it into two groups with scores of 0 and 1 respectively. Ahmed et al reported that endometrial volume can be a candidate predictor of in-vitro fertilization success to replace the traditional endometrial thickness, because it was significantly differenced between pregnant and non-pregnant women on day of triggering and embryo transfer ( 26 ). On the contrary, Assen et al analyzed 142 patients in their study and found that endometrial volume assessed by 3D transvaginal ultrasound was not a useful tool for predicting pregnancy in single blastocyst embryo transfer cycles and the AUC was 0.48 ( 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMT has been broadly acknowledged as a prognostic indicator for endometrial receptivity, but the results are controversial (2,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). In most previous studies, EMT was monitored during ovarian stimulation in fresh embryo transfer cycles, or during the endometrium proliferation phase in frozenthawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles, or in the luteal phase on the embryo transfer day (2,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maged et al [ 13 ] used two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and a 3D power Doppler ultrasound to measure endometrial volume and sub-endometrial blood perfusion in 82 patients undergoing embryo transfer on the hCG day and ET day, respectively. The results showed a statistically significant difference in the endometrial volume between pregnant and nonpregnant groups ( P < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%