The Measurement of Fatigue in Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review of Unidimensional and Multidimensional Fatigue Measures

Abstract

Fatigue is a common symptom associated with a wide range of chronic diseases. A large number of instruments have been developed to measure fatigue. An assessment regarding the reliability, validity, and utility of fatigue measures is time-consuming for the clinician and researcher, and few reviews exist on which to draw such information. The aim of this article is to present a critical review of fatigue measures, the populations in which the scales have been used, and the extent to which the psychometric properties of each instrument have been evaluated to provide clinicians and researchers with information on which to base decisions. Seven databases were searched for all articles that measured fatigue and offered an insight into the psychometric properties of the scales used over the period 1980-2007. Criteria for judging the "ideal" measure were developed to encompass scale usability, clinical/research utility, and the robustness of psychometric properties. Twenty-two fatigue measures met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. A further 17 measures met some of the criteria, but have not been tested beyond initial development, and are reviewed briefly at the end of the article. The review did not identify any instrument that met all the criteria of an ideal instrument. However, a small number of short instruments demonstrated good psychometric properties (Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS], Fatigue Impact Scale [FIS], and Brief Fatigue Inventory [BFI]), and three comprehensive instruments demonstrated the same (Fatigue Symptom Inventory [FSI], Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue [MAF], and Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory [MFSI]). Only four measures (BFI, FSS, FSI, and MAF) demonstrated the ability to detect change over time. The clinician and researcher also should consider the populations in which the scale has been used previously to assess its validity with their own patient group, and assess the content of a scale to ensure that the key qualitative aspects of fatigue of the population of interest are covered.

Identifying the subtypes of cancer-related fatigue: results from the population-based PROFILES registry

“…As such, the results of this exploratory study should be cautiously interpreted. Although the MFI purports to assess five dimensions of fatigue, these dimensions have not been wholly replicated [49]. Nevertheless, in this exploratory study, we identified three classes of CRF that had different associations with sleep quality, anxiety, anhedonia, and lifestyle factors.…”

Rethinking fatigue in Gaucher disease

“…Fatigue is a complex interaction between a disease process and factors such as muscle fatigue, self-perceived feelings of fatigue, and the individual's environment [34,41]. To address these issues, fatigue assessment instruments must be easy for individuals to understand and complete, must be capable of measuring the impact of therapeutic interventions, and have robust psychometric properties (Table 2) [42]. The literature review and surveys described herein underscore the need for a validated scale to measure fatigue in patients with GD.…”

Ambulatory Assessment in Neuropsychology

“…MS-related fatigue is mostfrequently defined as "a subjective lack of physical and/or mental energy that is perceived by the individual or caregiver to interfere with usual and desired activities" (Multiple Sclerosis Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines, 1998, p.2); however, multiple definitions exist (e.g., Comi, Leocani, Rossi, & Colombo, 2001;Mills & Young, 2008). Measuring fatigue is equally complex, and multiple self-report tools -of varying psychometric quality -are available to quantify subjective fatigue retrospectively in chronic illness (Whitehead, 2009).…”