1967
DOI: 10.1159/000258556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement of Functional Load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between King's (1967b) formulation and those of other writers is that it is based on conditional probabilities instead of being an information theory approach. Wang (1967; see also Wang & Thatcher, 1962) compares four information theory measures of functional load, including those of Greenberg (1959) and Hockett (1955;see also Hockett, 1966), by considering the extent to which they fulfill five conditions: (a) that we should be able to calculate the functional load of any set of phonemes in a language, (b) that the functional load of a set containing only one phoneme is zero, (c) that the phonemes of a set whose functional load is zero are in complementary distribution, (d) that the functional load of the union of two nonoverlapping sets is greater than or equal to the sum of their individual functional loads, and (e) that the functional load of a set is equal to the uncertainty of the language if the set corresponds to the entire phonemic system.…”
Section: Definitions Of Functional Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between King's (1967b) formulation and those of other writers is that it is based on conditional probabilities instead of being an information theory approach. Wang (1967; see also Wang & Thatcher, 1962) compares four information theory measures of functional load, including those of Greenberg (1959) and Hockett (1955;see also Hockett, 1966), by considering the extent to which they fulfill five conditions: (a) that we should be able to calculate the functional load of any set of phonemes in a language, (b) that the functional load of a set containing only one phoneme is zero, (c) that the phonemes of a set whose functional load is zero are in complementary distribution, (d) that the functional load of the union of two nonoverlapping sets is greater than or equal to the sum of their individual functional loads, and (e) that the functional load of a set is equal to the uncertainty of the language if the set corresponds to the entire phonemic system.…”
Section: Definitions Of Functional Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in Fig 1B, the start and end of a significant motif are marked by sudden drops in their rightward and leftward extension probabilities. There also is precedence of using such extension probabilities to analyze transitions in phonological linguistic elements in [69, 70]. The drop ratios are defined as and When D < η , the drop threshold cutoff, we consider the sub-sequence a significant motif.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose to merge the segments with low functional load [44], [17] , which is defined as the segment contrasts' work to differentiate utterances [21], [45], [46], [47]. Segments with low functional load can usually be disambiguated by their surroundings and convey little information [45].…”
Section: Functional Load and Economical Principlementioning
confidence: 99%