1974
DOI: 10.1080/03637757409375845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement of interpersonal attraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
400
0
13

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 711 publications
(419 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
400
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants' evaluations of the confederates' physical attractiveness were assessed with eight items from McCroskey and McCain's (1974) attractiveness measure on Likertscales that ranged from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much) (a = .93). Dating desire was assessed by asking participants to rate their desire to go on a date with the confederate (van Straaten et al, 2008) with responses ranging from 1 (absolutely not) to 9 (absolutely).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' evaluations of the confederates' physical attractiveness were assessed with eight items from McCroskey and McCain's (1974) attractiveness measure on Likertscales that ranged from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much) (a = .93). Dating desire was assessed by asking participants to rate their desire to go on a date with the confederate (van Straaten et al, 2008) with responses ranging from 1 (absolutely not) to 9 (absolutely).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpersonal liking was measured by using six items from the social attraction dimension of Mccroskey and McCain's (1974) interpersonal attraction scale. Sample items included "I think he/she could be a friend of mine."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social attractiveness is typically defined at two levels: the degree to which a person is liked and the degree to which a person is seen as good fit to one's social circle (McCroskey & McCain, 1974). The evaluation of a contact counterpart regarding social attractiveness is, thus, determined not only by liking but also by how well a contact counterpart is perceived to fit into one's friend networks.…”
Section: Willingness To Communicatementioning
confidence: 99%