2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement of intraocular pressure over positive soft contact lenses by rebound tonometry

Abstract: PurposeTo investigate if the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using rebound tonometry over disposable hydrogel (etafilcon A) contact lenses (CL) is affected by the positive power of the CLs.MethodsThe experimental group comprised 26 subjects, (8 male, 18 female). IOP measurements were undertaken on the subjects’ right eyes in random order using a Rebound Tonometer (ICare). The CLs had powers of +2.00 D and +6.00 D. Measurements were taken over each contact lens and also before and after the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zeri published the data of comparison of mean IOP without CLs, with +2.00 dioptric CL power and +6.00 dioptric CL power. Mean IOP values in his study were 19.0±4.1 mmHg, 17.6±4.6 mmHg and 17.8±4.1 mmHg respectively ( 4 ). Nacaroglou ( 14 ) and Anton ( 15 ) have found in their studies that the measurements over CL by RT were found to be significantly higher than measurements without CLs, 15.68±3.75 mmHg vs. 14.50±3.41 mmHg (P <0.001) and 17.5±4.3 vs. 16.4±3.5 mmHg (P = 0.05) respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zeri published the data of comparison of mean IOP without CLs, with +2.00 dioptric CL power and +6.00 dioptric CL power. Mean IOP values in his study were 19.0±4.1 mmHg, 17.6±4.6 mmHg and 17.8±4.1 mmHg respectively ( 4 ). Nacaroglou ( 14 ) and Anton ( 15 ) have found in their studies that the measurements over CL by RT were found to be significantly higher than measurements without CLs, 15.68±3.75 mmHg vs. 14.50±3.41 mmHg (P <0.001) and 17.5±4.3 vs. 16.4±3.5 mmHg (P = 0.05) respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, rebound tonometers (RT) are used routinely for IOP measurements and do not require anaesthetic or fluorescein administration. Icare rebound tonometer became available in a year 2005 ( 3 , 4 ). Being a portable handheld tonometer, it is also mobile and independant of a slit lamp, which speeds up the process of the IOP measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%