2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11417-019-09297-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement of Legitimacy: A Rush to Judgment?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Huq et al (2017; see also Jackson et al, 2012) suggest that legitimacy reflects a combination of felt obligation to obey the police and normative alignment with police. Others, such as Tankebe (2013), argue that legitimacy is best characterized as being comprised of four dimensions: procedural fairness, distributive justice, lawfulness, and effectiveness (for a recent discourse about these competing views, see the exchanges between Jackson and Bradford [2019], Cao and Graham [2019], and Trinkner [2019], among others). We concentrate only on trust in police and obligation to obey police as measures of legitimacy because these are the measures we are able to test and are the measures that feature prominently in extant research on police empowerment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Huq et al (2017; see also Jackson et al, 2012) suggest that legitimacy reflects a combination of felt obligation to obey the police and normative alignment with police. Others, such as Tankebe (2013), argue that legitimacy is best characterized as being comprised of four dimensions: procedural fairness, distributive justice, lawfulness, and effectiveness (for a recent discourse about these competing views, see the exchanges between Jackson and Bradford [2019], Cao and Graham [2019], and Trinkner [2019], among others). We concentrate only on trust in police and obligation to obey police as measures of legitimacy because these are the measures we are able to test and are the measures that feature prominently in extant research on police empowerment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Police legitimacy was also conceptualised in a number of ways in the studies reviewed: as perceived obligation to obey (Sargeant, 2017), as a combination of moral alignment and obligation to obey (Jackson et al, 2013), as confidence in police and police accountability (Schuck, 2019), and as trust and satisfaction with various police organisations (Karakus, 2017). That there was no consistent definition of legitimacy is a feature of ongoing debates in the literature about the appropriate operationalisation of this construct (see Cao and Graham, 2019;Jackson and Bradford, 2019;Trinkner, 2019 for a recent discourse centred on competing views over how to conceptualise and measure legitimacy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O debate sobre a conceituação e a mensuração da legitimidade segue acontecendo (Sun et al, 2018;Jackson & Bradford, 2019;Cao & Graham, 2019;Trinkner, 2019). Como reportado nas seções anteriores, apesar de sua relevância, a legitimidade ainda é um conceito desafiador enquanto categoria de trabalho, especialmente no delineamento e na aplicação de pesquisas empíricas.…”
Section: Notas Finaisunclassified