2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42000-020-00188-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement of vitamin D metabolites part II—the measurement of the various vitamin D metabolites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Please note that this list is not exhaustive and features a selection by the present authors; also note that additional studies are mentioned throughout this review. We refer the reader to the first installment of this review (Volmer et al, 2015) and other publications (Altieri et al, 2020; Makris et al, 2020; van den Ouweland et al, 2013; van den Ouweland, 2016), where many more excellent LC‐MS/MS assays for vitamin D metabolites are summarized. Gas chromatography (GC) has also been employed for vitamin D measurement (Lehner et al, 2021; Yang et al, 2019), but this separation technique is out of the scope of this review.…”
Section: Recent Instrumental Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please note that this list is not exhaustive and features a selection by the present authors; also note that additional studies are mentioned throughout this review. We refer the reader to the first installment of this review (Volmer et al, 2015) and other publications (Altieri et al, 2020; Makris et al, 2020; van den Ouweland et al, 2013; van den Ouweland, 2016), where many more excellent LC‐MS/MS assays for vitamin D metabolites are summarized. Gas chromatography (GC) has also been employed for vitamin D measurement (Lehner et al, 2021; Yang et al, 2019), but this separation technique is out of the scope of this review.…”
Section: Recent Instrumental Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LC–MS/MS is often described as the ‘gold standard’ method for vitamin D analysis as it provides increased sensitivity and specificity over other assays [ 4 ] as well as the ability to analyse multiple metabolites simultaneously [ 8 ]; however, it often requires trained laboratory personnel. Immunoassays dominate 25(OH)D determination in clinical laboratories [ 6 ] because they are fully automated and offer much faster measurements of 25(OH)D levels than LC–MS/MS methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the reliability of this indicator for vitamin D status has been questioned as it may not reflect the complex vitamin D metabolism. Several external factors influence serum and plasma 25(OH)D 3 levels, such as the sampling period of the year, geographical location where individuals live, ethnicity and exposure to sunlight [3]. Moreover, endogenous factors such as obesity, starvation, diabetes and glucocorticoids have a major influence on CYP2R1 activity [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants with 25(OH) 2 D 3 serum levels below 12 ng mL −1 2. Participants with 25(OH) 2 D 3 serum levels between 12 and 20 ng mL −1 3. Participants with 25(OH) 2 D 3 serum levels above 20 ng mL −1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%