2014
DOI: 10.5720/kjcn.2014.19.6.568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurements of the Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR) and the Accuracy of RMR Predictive Equations for Korean Farmers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There can be different results according to the sample population due to variations based on age, sex, ethnicity, or body composition. [31][32][33][34] Thom et al 13 stated that, in healthy women at the extremes of BMI (underweight and/ or obese), the validity of predictive equations in general is particularly poor, so in clinical settings these formulas should be used cautiously in underweight and obese individuals. According to Flack et al, 34 Harris-Benedict and FAO/WHO/UNU formulas give the most accurate results, but as lean body mass increases, the calculated BMR values tend to be lower than measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There can be different results according to the sample population due to variations based on age, sex, ethnicity, or body composition. [31][32][33][34] Thom et al 13 stated that, in healthy women at the extremes of BMI (underweight and/ or obese), the validity of predictive equations in general is particularly poor, so in clinical settings these formulas should be used cautiously in underweight and obese individuals. According to Flack et al, 34 Harris-Benedict and FAO/WHO/UNU formulas give the most accurate results, but as lean body mass increases, the calculated BMR values tend to be lower than measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the actual energy expenditure and the correct estimation formula is highly variable according to the studies conducted. There can be different results according to the sample population due to variations based on age, sex, ethnicity, or body composition 31–34. Thom et al13 stated that, in healthy women at the extremes of BMI (underweight and/ or obese), the validity of predictive equations in general is particularly poor, so in clinical settings these formulas should be used cautiously in underweight and obese individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our calorimetrically measured REE results are comparable to those in previous studies of Korean adults. In a study conducted by Son et al [ 31 ], the REE was measured in Korean farmers (50 men aged 50.2 ± 8.7 yrs with mean BMI of 25.0 ± 2.9 and 111 women aged 52.3 ± 6.6 yrs with mean BMI of 25.1 ± 2.8), and they reported that REE was 1,703 ± 205 kcal/day in men and 1,343 ± 139 kcal/day in women. Another study by Lee and Kim [ 32 ], which involved 28 male police officers aged 23 to 46 yrs (BMI = 24.6 ± 3.0), reported that the REE measured by indirect calorimetry was 1,748.3 ± 205.9 kcal/day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of the FAO weight equation to that study group resulted in a bias of −1.9%, and only 55% of participants had their REE accurately predicted. Another study, which involved Korean farmers [ 31 ], reported that the Cunningham equation [ 42 ], which is based on FFM, was the most accurate in predicting the subjects' REE. This equation had a bias of −0.47% in men and 1.4% in women, and the percentage of accurate predictions was 80% in men and 81% in women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations derived only for specific ethnic groups or for participants with BMIs of ≥ 40 kg/m 2 were excluded from the scope of the current study. Based on these criteria, we selected five REE prediction equations developed in Korean study populations [ 24 ]. The predictive equations for REE are summarized in Table 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%