2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-007-0147-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mechanical Behaviour of Clay Shales and Implications on the Design of Tunnels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, engineering rock mass is usually located in a triaxial compressive stress state. Therefore, we will deduce further the creep equation of rock under three-dimensional stress state based on the above mentioned creep equation under one-dimension stress state (Bonini et al 2009). …”
Section: Triaxial Creep Test Results Of Coalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, engineering rock mass is usually located in a triaxial compressive stress state. Therefore, we will deduce further the creep equation of rock under three-dimensional stress state based on the above mentioned creep equation under one-dimension stress state (Bonini et al 2009). …”
Section: Triaxial Creep Test Results Of Coalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, the visco-elastic strains are deviatoric and depend only on the deviatoric stress S i,j ; instead, the plastic strains are both deviatoric and volumetric and depend on r ij in accordance with the chosen flow rule (Bonini et al 2009). …”
Section: Creep Behaviormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this study, the contact between the cutterhead and the rock mass, as well as the contact between the shields and (Bonini et al 2009) Impact of Advance Rate on Entrapment Risk the rock mass, has been modeled by using interface elements on both the tunnel and shield boundaries, and by considering the gap between these components according to a non-uniform overcut in the shielded TBM. Crosssections of the front shield and the rear shield are illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction and modeling of the behavior of squeezing ground around tunnels has been the subject of many studies, and the reader is referred to the papers by Aydan et al (1996), Hoek and Marinos (2000), Hoek (2001), Barla et al (2004), Bonini et al (2009), Debernardi and Barla (2009), Sterpi and Gioda (2009), Cantieni and Anagnostou (2009aand 2009b as well as the papers by Ramoni and Anagnostou cited above for modern approaches and for further references. As indicated in Figure 1, the tunneling approaches may be divided into two large groups: those that proceed by sequential excavation (Figure 1a and b), and those that proceed by full face (Figure 1c).…”
Section: Tunneling In Squeezing Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 98%