2022
DOI: 10.3390/met12081384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mechanical Performance of Aluminum Foam Fabricated by Melt Processing with Different Foaming Agents: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract: The study presents the comparative analysis of the compressive response for the experimental aluminium foams of different parent alloys fabricated by melt processing with/without Ca additive and an expensive conventional TiH2 foaming agent or a cheap alternative CaCO3. It was recognized that the response of the foams is significantly dependent on the type of foaming agent and Ca additive due to the formation of low ductile and brittle products created in the foaming process. The presence of deformation bands a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AFS panels consisting of AlSi 12 foam and 6063Al alloy cover sheets were fabricated by melt foaming and hot rolling. Compared with other preparation methods, it not only reduces the cost of raw materials, but also reduces the need for machining capacity [46][47][48]. It has great prospects for industrialization and application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFS panels consisting of AlSi 12 foam and 6063Al alloy cover sheets were fabricated by melt foaming and hot rolling. Compared with other preparation methods, it not only reduces the cost of raw materials, but also reduces the need for machining capacity [46][47][48]. It has great prospects for industrialization and application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A melt-foaming method initially based on the ALPORAS © route was applied to fabricate the cellular Al-0.16Sc-0.17Zr (wt.%) foam samples (Al alloy containing 0.16 wt.% Sc and 0.17 wt.% Zr) with a porosity of ~78% [ 22 ]. The specific preparation procedure was elaborated in detail previously [ 23 , 24 ], which can be summarized as follows. A predetermined quantity of Al-0.16Sc-0.17Zr alloy (~1 kg) was melted in a crucible at a fixed temperature and then 2.0 wt.% Ca was introduced into the molten alloy to increase the viscosity of the melt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such comparisons for Al foam and A356 alloy foam are shown in Figure 7a,b. The linear dependences are based on our data [17], and the points are the data of other authors [7,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26]. It can be seen that there is a difference in the magnitude of σ pl .…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Figure 7. Comparison of plateau stress 𝜎 pl from the authors' results[17] and those of other authors for (a) Al foam[17] and[19,21,7,26], (b) A356 alloy foam[17] and[22][23][24][25] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%