2019
DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1520941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanical properties of rolled wire-reinforced aluminum composites at different strain values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 reveals that the deflection measured at the midpoint of the laminate during the flexural test increased steadily with the increase in the aspect ratio, L/t, from 30 to 43.33. An increase in the support span led to a decrease in the stability of the laminates against transverse bending load irrespective of the width of the laminates [13][14][15][16]. The lowest order of deflection was observed for the wider laminate due to the higher modulus offering higher resistance to bending.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Figure 5 reveals that the deflection measured at the midpoint of the laminate during the flexural test increased steadily with the increase in the aspect ratio, L/t, from 30 to 43.33. An increase in the support span led to a decrease in the stability of the laminates against transverse bending load irrespective of the width of the laminates [13][14][15][16]. The lowest order of deflection was observed for the wider laminate due to the higher modulus offering higher resistance to bending.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Figure 3 shows the procedure for measuring the mesh angle with the help of plane projection from µCT scans in order to calculate the mesh deformation. As concluded in [28], the change in the mesh angle is the major parameter of the inlay deformation during roll bonding. However, it loses the dominating role with an increase in rolling reduction.…”
Section: µCt-imaging Of Roll Bonded Compositesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Specimens did not fracture during the test procedure. Considering the various thicknesses of the composites, obtained at different rolling reductions, the absorbed energy value was divided by the moment of inertia (Iz) for the rectangle h composite × 20 mm, as is recommended in [28]. The moment of inertia was calculated for the initial specimen-to-pendulum contact line.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%