2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanical size effect as a mean-field breakdown phenomenon: Example of microscale single crystal beam bending

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Room temperature experiments were performed by Simons et al [4] on copper foils with thicknesses up to 100 µm clearly showing a considerable size effect. Similar results were found by Demir et al [5] on copper single crystals. Albers et al [6] performed numerical examinations by FEA, modeling a microgear tooth with 2-10 grains across the stressed sections.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Room temperature experiments were performed by Simons et al [4] on copper foils with thicknesses up to 100 µm clearly showing a considerable size effect. Similar results were found by Demir et al [5] on copper single crystals. Albers et al [6] performed numerical examinations by FEA, modeling a microgear tooth with 2-10 grains across the stressed sections.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…New sources get activated, most likely in the already present non-coplanar slip bands either by mutual shearing of slip bands as pointed out in Ref. [91], by rare dislocation cross slip events initiating new slip bands [99] or by the activation of already existing sources that require higher activation stress due to smaller segment length L in accord with Orowan's law (s Orowan~1 /L) [100,101]. These new sources again produce expanding dislocation loops on their respective glide planes, which induces the formation of more slip bands leading to a refinement of the slip band substructure (Fig.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Microstructure Evolution: Dynamic Slip Banmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[24][25][26] It is known that the mechanical behavior of UFG materials is different than those of CG materials, particularly with respect to the effect of grain size [27] and strain-hardening behavior. [28] Grain-boundary shear, which affects dislocations pile-up, [29] grain-boundary stability of severeplastic deformed materials, [30] dynamic recovery, [31] and dislocation bow-out, [32] have been proposed to describe the mechanical behavior of UFG materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%