2023
DOI: 10.1177/21582440231178260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mechanism Explaining the Effect of HEXACO Traits on Vietnamese University Graduates’ Networking Behavior for Finding Employment

Abstract: This study examines the relationships between university graduates’ HEXACO traits and networking behavior for finding a job through job search network size. We integrate individual difference theory and social network theory to explain these links in two manners. We use individual difference theory to demonstrate that graduates with HEXACO personality traits have different job search network sizes, and we apply social network theory to test whether job search network size affect the networking intensity of gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first used a set of mixed questions to prevent respondents from determining which features were related to which variables. 92,93 Additionally, to evaluate the CMV in our study, we used the most well-liked statistical methods, including Harman's single-factor test and partial elimination of the general construct. 89,94 The results of the computed principal component analysis (PCA) revealed 7 different variables that accounted for 64.1% of the overall variation (Table 6).…”
Section: Common Methods Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first used a set of mixed questions to prevent respondents from determining which features were related to which variables. 92,93 Additionally, to evaluate the CMV in our study, we used the most well-liked statistical methods, including Harman's single-factor test and partial elimination of the general construct. 89,94 The results of the computed principal component analysis (PCA) revealed 7 different variables that accounted for 64.1% of the overall variation (Table 6).…”
Section: Common Methods Variancementioning
confidence: 99%