1980
DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(80)90003-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanism of air bubble entrainment in self-aerated flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with observations [15,19,21]. HALBRONN et al [19] observed "only extremely fine bubbles" (i.e.…”
Section: Appendix 1 Bubble Breakup In Self-aerated Flowssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are consistent with observations [15,19,21]. HALBRONN et al [19] observed "only extremely fine bubbles" (i.e.…”
Section: Appendix 1 Bubble Breakup In Self-aerated Flowssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Little information is available on the size of the water droplets surrounded by water. Photographs suggest that the droplet sizes are of similar size as the large air bubbles [21] and equation (11) estimate of the droplet sizes. It must be emphasised that the contribution of large particles (bubbles or droplets) to the interface area is relatively small.…”
Section: Air-water Interface Areamentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Local aeration by impinging jets is also very common, with vortices in the intensive shear layer at the penetration point strong enough to entrain air at their core. Volkart (1980) experimentally analysed the mechanism of air bubble entrapment in self-aerated flows in a steep partially filled pipe, using a stroboscopic technique. He found that the air bubble consequent to drops impinging on the water surface is always bigger than the pertinent water drop and also computed the minimum vertical distance of a water drop in order to form an air bubble.…”
Section: The Effect Of Air Entrapmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, drops remain stable if W D < 10-12, whereas they break-up by different mechanisms for higher values (Krzeczkowski 1980, Hwang et al 1996. Volkart (1980) observed in self-aerated model flows that ejected drops "larger than 6 mm [. .…”
Section: Scale Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%