DNA damage that escapes repair and blocks replicative DNA polymerases is tolerated by bypass mechanisms that fall into two general categories: error-free template switching and error-prone translesion synthesis. Prior studies of DNA damage responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have demonstrated that repair mechanisms are critical for survival when a single, high dose of DNA damage is delivered, while bypass/tolerance mechanisms are more important for survival when the damage level is low and continuous (acute and chronic damage, respectively). In the current study, epistatic interactions between DNA-damage tolerance genes were examined and compared when haploid yeast cells were exposed to either chronic ultraviolet light or chronic methyl methanesulfonate. Results demonstrate that genes assigned to error-free and error-prone bypass pathways similarly promote survival in the presence of each type of chronic damage. In addition to using defined sources of chronic damage, rates of spontaneous mutations generated by the Pol z translesion synthesis DNA polymerase (complex insertions in a frameshift-reversion assay) were used to infer epistatic interactions between the same genes. Similar epistatic interactions were observed in analyses of spontaneous mutation rates, suggesting that chronic DNA-damage responses accurately reflect those used to tolerate spontaneous lesions. These results have important implications when considering what constitutes a safe and acceptable level of exogenous DNA damage. D AMAGE to cellular DNA that results from normal metabolic processes is classified as spontaneous, while that resulting from exogenous physical or chemical agents is considered induced. Spontaneous damage occurs at low, continuous levels and hence is chronic in nature. Though induced damage is typically delivered in a single, acute dose, it can also be chronic, with examples including daily exposure to solar radiation or cigarette smoke. Spontaneous and induced damage are dealt with by two general, evolutionarily conserved mechanisms: one that permanently removes the damage and one that temporarily bypasses the damage, allowing it to be tolerated (for a general overview, see Ciccia and Elledge 2010). Most damage removal occurs via conserved excision repair pathways, but a small number of damages can be directly reversed enzymatically (e.g., thymine-thymine dimer reversal by photolyase). Damage removal by excision repair generates a single-strand gap that is filled using the complementary, undamaged strand as a template and hence is a high-fidelity process. Such repair only operates, however, when a relevant lesion is present in double-strand DNA. Damage that escapes repair and is encountered during replication can block the progress of DNA synthesis, leading to the formation of a single-strand gap opposite the lesion, replication fork collapse, cell-cycle arrest, and/or death. DNA-damage bypass/tolerance pathways thus become critically important during S and G2 phases, as these allow completion of replication and ...