2014
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2013.809589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mechanism of State Charter School Policy Adoption: The Case of American States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for each Charter school gives emphasis on different areas and shows diversity in terms of organizational structures and management types. As Lee (2014) stated, how competitive market structure imposes an obligation to organizations about servicing better to customers and considering their demands, such an educational concept based on accountability and performance can be considered as a system that prioritize desires and needs of students and their families. Charter Schools are accountable for authorized government agencies, teachers, families and benefactors (Hill & Lake, 2004, s.3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for each Charter school gives emphasis on different areas and shows diversity in terms of organizational structures and management types. As Lee (2014) stated, how competitive market structure imposes an obligation to organizations about servicing better to customers and considering their demands, such an educational concept based on accountability and performance can be considered as a system that prioritize desires and needs of students and their families. Charter Schools are accountable for authorized government agencies, teachers, families and benefactors (Hill & Lake, 2004, s.3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study utilizes seven explanatory variables relevant to interest groups, Colorado county characteristics, and control variables. No one doubts that interest groups are primary policy actors who affect mechanisms of the policy process (Chari, Hogan, & Murphy, 2010;Lee, 2014). Several scholars (Loomis & Cigler, 2006;Ramirez, 2009) demonstrate that a critical role of interest groups is usually shown in the growth management policy process as well.…”
Section: Theoretical Approaches To Growth Management Policy Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several classic studies demonstrate that growth management policy is influenced by several jurisdiction characteristics such as the unemployment rate of jurisdictions, a rapid population growth rate of jurisdictions, and the residents' educational level in jurisdictions. It is fundamental for researchers to test the impetus of jurisdiction characteristics in examining mechanisms of the policy process (Bushouse, 2011;Lee, 2014;Ostrom, 2007). Mazmanian and Sabatier (1980) also propose that jurisdictions' socio-economic and demographic factors are a good set of explanatory factors that help examine mechanisms of local institutional choice and use.…”
Section: County Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%