The MeCUE Questionnaire (2.0): Meeting Five Basic Requirements for Lean and Standardized UX Assessment

Minge, Michael; Thüring, Manfred

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91797-9_33

Cited by 23 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While the questionnaire is comprehensive, it still overlooks certain aspects of UX, including perceptions of acoustic and haptic quality, and the trustworthiness of the system and the received information. Equally, the questionnaire focuses on purely technical interaction rather than the interpersonal relations or social influences of UX (Minge and Thüring 2018).…”

Section: Mecue 20 Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our review of the three standardized UX questionnaires led to the selection of meCUE 2.0 as the research method for this study. At the time, it represented the most current and the most comprehensive method, developed with the most recent research in mind (Minge and Thüring 2018). It was also the only method that incorporated emotions into the evaluation.…”

Section: Mecue 20 Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this case, observation involves not only monitoring the participants, but also collecting system data during usage. The evaluation model incorporates the meCUE 2.0 questionnaire from Minge and Thüring (2018) and the SUS usability questionnaire from Brooke (1996). The latter was selected as it adds greater weight to issues of usability than meCUE 2.0 and has been reliably and extensively used in both academia and industry.…”

Section: Expanded Model For Usability and User Experience Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience

Chaudary

Pohjolainen

Aziz³

et al. 2021

Virtual Reality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports the development of a specialized teleguidance-based navigation assistance system for the blind and the visually impaired. We present findings from a usability and user experience study conducted with 11 blind and visually impaired participants and a sighted caretaker. Participants sent live video feed of their field of view to the remote caretaker’s terminal from a smartphone camera attached to their chest. The caretaker used this video feed to guide them through indoor and outdoor navigation scenarios using a combination of haptic and voice-based communication. Haptic feedback was provided through vibrating actuators installed in the grip of a Smart Cane. Two haptic methods for directional guidance were tested: (1) two vibrating actuators to guide left and right movement and (2) a single vibrating actuator with differentiating vibration patterns for the same purpose. Users feedback was collected using a meCUE 2.0 standardized questionnaire, interviews, and group discussions. Participants’ perceptions toward the proposed navigation assistance system were positive. Blind participants preferred vibrational guidance with two actuators, while partially blind participants preferred the single actuator method. Familiarity with cane use and age were important factors in the choice of haptic methods by both blind and partially blind users. It was found that smartphone camera provided sufficient field of view for remote assistance; position and angle are nonetheless important considerations. Ultimately, more research is needed to confirm our preliminary findings. We also present an expanded evaluation model developed to carry out further research on assistive systems.

show abstract

Section: Mecue 20 Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mecue 20 Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Expanded Model For Usability and User Experience Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience

Chaudary

Pohjolainen

Aziz³

et al. 2021

Virtual Reality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They are the following [16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. These nine papers include two papers from the creators of meCUE [19,20], in which they describe the questionnaire and compare the results obtained from it with AttrakDiff and UEQ. This list also includes the paper where the UEQ questionnaire is presented in 2008 [16], in which AttrakDiff is used for comparison purposes.…”

Section: Eligibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Standardized Questionnaires for User Experience Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review

Oreiro

Herrera

Quirós

et al. 2019

13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient ‪Intelligence UCAmI 2019‬

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standardized questionnaires are one of the methods used to evaluate User Experience (UX). Standardized questionnaires are composed of an invariable group of questions that users answer themselves after using a product or system. They are considered reliable and economical to apply. The standardized questionnaires most recognized for UX evaluation are AttrakDiff, UEQ, and meCUE. Although the structure, format, and content of each of the questionnaires are known in detail, there is no systematic literature review (SLR) that categorizes the uses of these questionnaires in primary studies. This SLR presents the eligibility protocol and the results obtained by reviewing 946 papers from four digital databases, of which 553 primary studies were analyzed in detail. Different characteristics of use were obtained, such as which questionnaire is used more extensively, in which geographical context, and the size of the sample used in each study, among others.

show abstract

“…This method evaluates the quality of UX by exploiting interaction-related mental models (irMMs). In the last years, the irMMs-based method reached its release 2.0 thanks to the integration with the meCUE questionnaire [3]. This integration improved the evaluation process from different points of view; all the fundamental components of UX are considered and UX quantification joined the qualitative results.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactive redesign of products' User eXperience: how to

Filippi

Motyl

2021

Int J Interact Des Manuf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, User eXperience (UX) is one of the main concerns in developing innovative products. The literature already offers several UX design methods and tools. Among them, the interaction related Mental Models-based UX evaluation method appeared some years ago. Recently, the modular evaluation of key Components of User Experience questionnaire, a tool for quantifying products' UX, integrated this method. The knowledge acquired thanks to this synergy suggested the way to define and exploit guidelines for interactive redesign of the UX of products. Because of their origin, these guidelines encompass all UX characteristics reputed as meaningful like usefulness, subjective feelings, motivational aspects, emotions, etc. Moreover, these guidelines are generic enough to be used in different situations and on different products; their structure and functioning make them independent from the methods and tools used to collect data and to implement them, widening in this way their applicability in almost any UX interactive redesign activity by almost any researcher/practitioner. The redesign suggestions offered by these guidelines, as well as the procedures to collect and analyze the data to define other guidelines and suggest the best ways to implement them, push different competencies (engineers, UX experts, psychologists, etc.) to work in synergy, just like an interactive design context requires. To date, this research defined ten guidelines; a first adoption in the field starts witnessing their goodness and effectiveness. The paper describes in detail how to define and exploit the guidelines, as well as the first adoption of them in a real redesign context. KeywordsProduct User eXperience • Interactive User eXperience redesign guidelines • Mental models • Interaction related mental models (IrMMs)-based UX evaluation method • Components of User Experience (CUE) model

show abstract

The MeCUE Questionnaire (2.0): Meeting Five Basic Requirements for Lean and Standardized UX Assessment

Cited by 23 publications

References 21 publications

Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience

Teleguidance-based remote navigation assistance for visually impaired and blind people—usability and user experience

Standardized Questionnaires for User Experience Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review

Interactive redesign of products' User eXperience: how to

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About